Literature DB >> 24273377

Computer-Assisted Speech Training for Cochlear Implant Patients: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Future Directions.

Qian-Jie Fu1, John J Galvin.   

Abstract

Learning electrically stimulated speech patterns can be a new and difficult experience for cochlear implant patients. Cochlear implantation alone may not fully meet the needs of many patients, and additional auditory rehabilitation may be necessary to maximize the benefits of the implant device. A recently developed computer-assisted speech-training program provides cochlear implant patients with the means to conduct auditory rehabilitation at home. The training software targets important acoustic contrasts between speech stimuli and provides auditory and visual feedback as well as progressive training, thereby maintaining patients' interest in the auditory training exercises. Recent scientific studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of such specialized auditory training programs in improving cochlear implant patients' speech recognition performance. Provided with an inexpensive and accessible auditory training program, cochlear implant patients may find the motivation and momentum to get the most from the implant device.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory training; Cochlear implants; Computer-assisted speech training

Year:  2007        PMID: 24273377      PMCID: PMC3837623          DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  37 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  P A Busby; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Performance of cochlear implant patients as a function of time.

Authors:  L G Spivak; S B Waltzman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-09

5.  Indication of a relation between speech perception and temporal resolution for cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Y Cazals; M Pelizzone; A Kasper; P Montandon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Long-term effects of multichannel cochlear implant usage.

Authors:  S B Waltzman; N L Cohen; W H Shapiro
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  P W Dawson; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  [Intensive inpatient therapy of auditory processing and perceptual disorders in childhood].

Authors:  G Hesse; M Nelting; B Mohrmann; A Laubert; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.

Authors:  R F Gray; S J Quinn; I Court; Z Vanat; D M Baguley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Options for Auditory Training for Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Anne D Olson
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of Serious Gaming on Speech-in-Noise Intelligibility in Adult Cochlear Implantees: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Pierre Reynard; Virginie Attina; Samar Idriss; Ruben Hermann; Claire Barilly; Evelyne Veuillet; Charles-Alexandre Joly; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Comparison of Two Music Training Approaches on Music and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Bert Maat; Deniz Başkent; Rolien H Free
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Gameplay as a source of intrinsic motivation in a randomized controlled trial of auditory training for tinnitus.

Authors:  Derek J Hoare; Nicolas Van Labeke; Abby McCormack; Magdalena Sereda; Sandra Smith; Hala Al Taher; Victoria L Kowalkowski; Mike Sharples; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.