Literature DB >> 7652056

Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies.

F Molina1, F Ortiz Monasterio.   

Abstract

A modified technique for mandibular distraction is reported: an oblique corticotomy is made in the external cortex of the mandible at the level of the gonial angle. Two intraosseous stainless steel pins are inserted and are joined by a softer distraction screw. We make two corticotomies, one horizontal and one vertical, and insert three pins to achieve bidirectional distraction when the mandibular body and the ascending ramus are hypoplasic. This procedure has been used in 87 patients with unilateral hemifacial microsomia and 19 patients with bilateral mandibular hypoplasia. A mean elongation of 19 mm was obtained in the unilateral group. In the bilateral cases a mean vertical elongation of 7.5 mm and a mean horizontal elongation of 14 mm were obtained. A great improvement of the facial asymmetry was achieved in all the patients. The follow-up in this series varies from 3 months to 3 1/2 years (mean, 19 months in unilateral cases and 12 months in bilateral cases). No relapses have been observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7652056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  25 in total

1.  [Evaluation of potential damage to the regenerate during callus molding after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Experimental study using an animal model].

Authors:  C Kunz; N Adolphs; P Buescher; B Hammer; B Rahn
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-05

2.  Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: interfragmentary micromovement.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Katherine L Rafferty; Mark A Egbert; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Mandibular mechanics after osteotomy and distraction appliance placement I: Postoperative mobility of the osteotomy site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Katherine L Rafferty; Mark A Egbert; Susan W Herring
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 4.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Preliminary results of an animal study with a dentally fixed distraction device.

Authors:  B Braumann; B Niederhagen; C Schmolke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 6.  Distraction histogenesis of the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Aydin Gülses; Metin Sencimen; Mustafa Ayna; Matthias Gierloff; Yahya Açil
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-18

7.  Craniofacial microsomia.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Carrie Heike
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  Quantitative histomorphometric assessment of regenerate cellularity and bone quality in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Alero F Inyang; Daniel A Schwarz; Ameen M Jamali; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  An interview with Alvaro Alfredo Figueroa.

Authors:  Alvaro Alfredo Figueroa; Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna; Mônica Tirre de Souza Araujo; Geórgia Wain Thi Lau; Lúcio Henrique E G Maia
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

10.  Levels of Evidence in the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Citation Analysis of the Top 50 'Classic' Papers.

Authors:  Kenneth M Joyce; Cormac W Joyce; John C Kelly; Jack L Kelly; Sean M Carroll
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.