Literature DB >> 16546640

Mandibular mechanics after osteotomy and distraction appliance placement I: Postoperative mobility of the osteotomy site.

Zongyang Sun1, Katherine L Rafferty, Mark A Egbert, Susan W Herring.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fixation at the osteotomy site for mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) is probably not rigid, especially during mastication. Micromotion may affect the course of DO. This study aimed to measure the mobility of the fresh distractor-fixed osteotomy site in response to mastication and masticatory muscle stimulation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight domestic pigs, 6 to 8 weeks old, underwent osteotomy of the right mandible and placement of a distractor appliance. Immediately after surgery, displacement at 3 different locations (superior-lateral, inferior-lateral, and inferior-medial) of the osteotomy site was assessed using ultrasound piezoelectric crystals or differential variable reluctance transducers (DVRTs). The amount of lengthening or shortening at each location was measured during mastication and muscle stimulation. Displacement was also measured for bilateral osteotomy during muscle stimulation from a subgroup of 12 pigs.
RESULTS: The osteotomy site demonstrated significant mobility during power strokes of mastication with an average magnitude of 0.3 to 0.4 mm. Distinct patterns of displacement were associated with different locations, and the patterns varied between chewing sides. The most common pattern was lengthening at the superior-lateral and shortening at both inferior sites. Similar amounts of displacement were observed during the stimulation of jaw-closers (masseter and medial pterygoid), but the patterns produced by these muscles did not completely explain the masticatory pattern. Opening the osteotomy to 1.5 mm did not alter the displacements observed during muscle stimulation. Bilateral osteotomy tended to decrease displacement.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that during mastication and masticatory muscle stimulation, an acute mandibular osteotomy site is mobile despite fixation by a distractor appliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16546640      PMCID: PMC1414645          DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  30 in total

Review 1.  Effects of early motion on healing of musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  J A Buckwalter
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  Histopathologic and biochemical changes in the muscles affected by distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

Authors:  E Fisher; D A Staffenberg; J G McCarthy; D C Miller; J Zeng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device.

Authors:  J W Polley; A A Figueroa
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies.

Authors:  F Molina; F Ortiz Monasterio
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  One- or two-plate fixation of mandibular angle fractures?

Authors:  H P Schierle; R Schmelzeisen; B Rahn; C Pytlik
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Mandibular growth after distraction in patients under 48 months of age.

Authors:  L H Hollier; J H Kim; B Grayson; J G McCarthy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Bone surface strains and internal bony pressures at the jaw joint of the miniature pig during masticatory muscle contraction.

Authors:  Z J Liu; S W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.

Authors:  V Shetty; D McBrearty; M Fourney; A A Caputo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Stability testing of a two miniplate fixation technique for mandibular angle fractures. An in vitro study.

Authors:  B H Choi; J H Yoo; K N Kim; H S Kang
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.

Authors:  A E Goodship; J L Cunningham; J Kenwright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: interfragmentary micromovement.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Katherine L Rafferty; Mark A Egbert; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Changes in growth and morphology of the condyle following mandibular distraction in minipigs: overloading or underloading?

Authors:  Katherine L Rafferty; Zongyang Sun; Mark Egbert; Daniel W Bakko; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 2.633

3.  The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm.

Authors:  Narges Shayesteh Moghaddam; Ahmadreza Jahadakbar; Amirhesam Amerinatanzi; Roman Skoracki; Michael Miller; David Dean; Mohammad Elahinia
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-22

5.  Current Trends in Surgical Airway Management of Neonates with Robin Sequence.

Authors:  Kenneth L Fan; Max Mandelbaum; Justin Buro; Alex Rokni; Gary F Rogers; Jerry W Chao; Albert K Oh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-11-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.