Literature DB >> 19958167

Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Uriel Zapata1, Mohammed E Elsalanty, Paul C Dechow, Lynne A Opperman.   

Abstract

Mandibular bone transport (MBT) distraction osteogenesis devices are used for achieving reconstruction of mandibular defects in a predictable way, with few complications, less complexity than other alternative surgical procedures, and minimal tissue morbidity. However, selection of appropriate MBT device characteristics is critical for ensuring both their mechanical soundness and their optimal distraction function for each patient's condition. This article assesses six characteristics of currently available MBT devices to characterize their design and function and to classify them in a way that assists the selection of the best device option for each clinical case. In addition, the present work provides a framework for both the biomechanical conception of new devices and the modification of existing ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19958167      PMCID: PMC2877121          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  89 in total

1.  Evaluation of a semiburied, fixed-trajectory, curvilinear, distraction device in an animal model.

Authors:  E B Seldin; M J Troulis; L B Kaban
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report.

Authors:  P Kessler; J Wiltfang; F W Neukam
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: diagnosis and treatment planning considerations.

Authors:  Richard Conley; Harry Legan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Spring-mediated mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Mehrdad M Mofid; Nozomu Inoue; Anthony P Tufaro; Craig A Vander Kolk; Paul N Manson
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 5.  Resorbable bone distraction: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Fernando D Burstein; J Kerwin Williams
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Continuous mandibular distraction osteogenesis using superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA).

Authors:  S Idelsohn; J Peña; D Lacroix; J A Planell; F J Gil; A Arcas
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Reconstruction of mandibular symphyseal defects by trifocal distraction osteogenesis: an experimental study in Rhesus.

Authors:  J Li; B Ying; J Hu; S Zhu; T W Braun
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Arced segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  B Jønsson; S J Siemssen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Rapid lengthening of rabbit mandibular ramus by using nitinol spring: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hong-Zhi Zhou; Min Hu; Jun Yao; Liang Ma
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.046

View more
  5 in total

1.  Transport distraction osteogenesis for maxillomandibular reconstruction: current concepts and applications.

Authors:  R S Neelakandan; Darpan Bhargava
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

Review 2.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

3.  Biomechanics of the canine mandible during bone transport distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Paul C Dechow; Ikuya Watanabe; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Repair of segmental bone defects in the maxilla by transport disc distraction osteogenesis: Clinical experience with a new device.

Authors:  James Boonzaier; George Vicatos; Rushdi Hendricks
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

5.  Creation of Bone and Soft Tissue in Postmaxillectomy Patients Using Curvilinear Transport Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Rushdi Hendricks; George Vicatos
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.