Literature DB >> 17532283

Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: interfragmentary micromovement.

Zongyang Sun1, Katherine L Rafferty, Mark A Egbert, Susan W Herring.   

Abstract

Micromovement at a fracture or distraction osteogenesis (DO) site may play a significant role in bone formation and healing. Mastication is an important physiological process that can cause substantial micromovement at a mandibular disjunction. The purpose of this study is to characterize and quantify the micromovement caused by mastication. Eighteen pigs, divided into three groups based on duration of consolidation, received a unilateral (right) mandibular angle distraction osteogenesis protocol. Differential variable reluctance transducers (DVRTs) and ultrasound crystals were used to measure the change of gap width as well as interfragmentary movement during mastication. Synchronized chewing video and interfragmentary movement recordings were used to determine the magnitude and direction of micromovement at different phases of the chewing cycle. The magnitude of micromovement did not increase significantly with distraction up to almost 5 mm, but did decrease gradually with consolidation. The average micromovement magnitude during the distraction phase was 0.2-0.3 mm, equaling 50,000-250,000 microstrain (muepsilon) on interfragmentary tissue. The dominant deformation pattern was bending in the sagittal plane. The most common direction of bending at the power stroke of chewing was concave dorsally, i.e., superior shortening and inferior lengthening. These findings elucidate how masticatory mechanics affect a mandibular distraction site, and the measurements may be useful for future simulation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17532283      PMCID: PMC1987717          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.04.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  39 in total

1.  Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.

Authors:  Julie Glowacki; E Mark Shusterman; Maria Troulis; Ralph Holmes; David Perrott; Leonard B Kaban
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Effect of weightbearing on bone formation during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Kwok-Sui Leung; Wing-Hoi Cheung; Hiu-Yan Yeung; Kwong-Man Lee; Kwok-Pui Fung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of the pins of a mandibular external distractor.

Authors:  Jaime Gateno; Kyoung-Won Kim; Zahid Lalani; John F Teichgraeber; Michael A K Liebschner; Jeremy J Lemoine; James J Xia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Physiology of feeding in miniature pigs.

Authors:  S W Herring; R P Scapino
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  The dynamics of mastication in pigs.

Authors:  S W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  The effects of magnitude and frequency of distraction forces on tissue regeneration in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.

Authors:  Peter A Kessler; Hans A Merten; Friedrich W Neukam; Jörg Wiltfang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Effect of distraction rate and consolidation period on bone density following mandibular osteodistraction in rats.

Authors:  G J King; Z J Liu; L L Wang; I Y Chiu; M F Whelan; G J Huang
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of 3278 cases.

Authors:  M M Mofid; P N Manson; B C Robertson; A P Tufaro; J J Elias; C A Vander Kolk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Mandibular distraction in the absence of an ascending ramus and condyle.

Authors:  Christi M Cavaliere; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: experimental analyses with a rat model.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Loboa; Tony D Fang; Stephen M Warren; Derek P Lindsey; Kenton D Fong; Michael T Longaker; Dennis R Carter
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site.

Authors:  Zongyang Sun; Susan W Herring
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Bone lengthening osteogenesis, a combination of intramembranous and endochondral ossification: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Francisco Forriol; Luca Denaro; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Hirofumi Taira; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-03-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.