Literature DB >> 18842889

Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex.

Tobias H Donner1, Dov Sagi, Yoram S Bonneh, David J Heeger.   

Abstract

Motion-induced blindness (MIB) is a visual phenomenon in which a salient static target spontaneously fluctuates in and out of visual awareness when surrounded by a moving mask pattern. It has been hypothesized that MIB reflects an antagonistic interplay between cortical representations of the static target and moving mask. Here, we report evidence for such antagonism between human ventral and dorsal visual cortex during MIB. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses in ventral visual area V4 decreased with the subjective disappearance of the target. These response decreases were specific for the cortical subregion corresponding retinotopically to the target, occurred early in time with respect to the perceptual report, and could not be explained by shifts of attention in reaction to target disappearance. At the same time, responses increased in mask-specific subregions in dorsal visual areas in and around the intraparietal sulcus. These opposite responses in ventral and dorsal visual areas occurred only during subjective target disappearance, not when the target was physically removed. Perceptual reports of target disappearance were furthermore associated with a "global" modulation of activity, which was delayed in time, and evident throughout early visual cortex, for both subjective target disappearance and physical target removal. We conclude that awareness of the target is tightly linked to the strength of its representation in ventral visual cortex, and that the mask representation in dorsal visual cortex plays a crucial role in the spontaneous suppression of the target representation during MIB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18842889      PMCID: PMC2570589          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2371-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  79 in total

1.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Motion-induced blindness in normal observers.

Authors:  Y S Bonneh; A Cooperman; D Sagi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?

Authors:  David J Heeger; David Ress
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion.

Authors:  Erich W Graf; Wendy J Adams; Martin Lages
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Linking motion-induced blindness to perceptual filling-in.

Authors:  Li-Chuan Hsu; Su-Ling Yeh; Peter Kramer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Fixational eye movements in normal and pathological vision.

Authors:  Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and FMRI response in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: cause and effect.

Authors:  Yoram S Bonneh; Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Moshe Fried; Alexander Cooperman; David J Heeger; Amos Arieli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Neural activity in the visual thalamus reflects perceptual suppression.

Authors:  Melanie Wilke; Kai-Markus Mueller; David A Leopold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation?

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Stimulus-related neuroimaging in task-engaged subjects is best predicted by concurrent spiking.

Authors:  Bruss Lima; Mariana M B Cardoso; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Aniruddha Das
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  Niels A Kloosterman; Thomas Meindertsma; Arjan Hillebrand; Bob W van Dijk; Victor A F Lamme; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Long-range traveling waves of activity triggered by local dichoptic stimulation in V1 of behaving monkeys.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; David J Heeger; Randolph Blake; Eyal Seidemann
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Saccade planning evokes topographically specific activity in the dorsal and ventral streams.

Authors:  Golbarg T Saber; Franco Pestilli; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Early visual cortex reflects initiation and maintenance of task set.

Authors:  Abdurahman S Elkhetali; Ryan J Vaden; Sean M Pool; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The neuroimaging signal is a linear sum of neurally distinct stimulus- and task-related components.

Authors:  Mariana M B Cardoso; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Bruss Lima; Elena Glushenkova; Aniruddha Das
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.