Literature DB >> 16639612

Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: evidence from motion-induced blindness.

Werner Klotz1, Ulrich Ansorge.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured in response to the objective offset of a visual disk under two physically similar conditions: (1) visible conditions in which the target disk was well perceived and (2) invisible conditions in which participants reported to have not seen the target because of motion-induced blindness (Bonneh, Cooperman, & Sagi in Nature 411:798-801, 2001). Electrophysiological responses to the physical offset of the target disk were almost completely absent in the invisible conditions (Experiment 2). In the same conditions, the physical offset was almost completely invisible (Experiment 1). Results suggest an augmenting function of prior awareness of a stimulus for the offset-triggered ERP of that stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16639612     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0058-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  55 in total

1.  Motion-induced blindness in normal observers.

Authors:  Y S Bonneh; A Cooperman; D Sagi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

3.  Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Manfred Heumann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-08

5.  Linking motion-induced blindness to perceptual filling-in.

Authors:  Li-Chuan Hsu; Su-Ling Yeh; Peter Kramer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Orientation-selective adaptation during motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Leila Montaser-Kouhsari; Farshad Moradi; Amin Zandvakili; Hossein Esteky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Odmar Neumann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  F Tong; K Nakayama; J T Vaughan; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  M Eimer; F Schlaghecken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Visual evoked potentials: concomitants of metacontrast in late components.

Authors:  B Bridgeman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Yoram S Bonneh; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling.

Authors:  David R Painter; Jeffrey J Kim; Angela I Renton; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.