Literature DB >> 1760765

DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I: Methodology.

R B Mazess1, C A Gifford, J P Bisek, H S Barden, J A Hanson.   

Abstract

Bone mineral content and bone mineral density (BMC in g and BMD in g/cm2) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). DEXA scans in the lateral decubitus position required about 12 minutes for the L2-L4 sequence at 0.75 mA (dose 5 mrem) and 4 minutes at 4.75 mA (7 mrem). The former scans were done with the Lunar DPX densitometer and the latter with the Lunar DPX-L. One test of the algorithms used for measurement is the equality of BMC in both AP and lateral projections. BMC in the lateral projection averaged about 1% lower than in the AP projection in phantoms and for L2 + L3 in 8 subjects, but the difference was not significant. Additional tests were done on the effects of tissue thickness and position from the tabletop. There was little or no influence of tissue thickness from 18 to 30 cm on BMD results, but there was a small influence of thickness below 18 cm (0.01 g/cm2; P = 0.01) and of distance from the tabletop at extremes of positioning (0.02 g/cm2; P = 0.06). The precision in vivo was similar for both 4- and 12-minute scans; the standard deviation of repeat measurements was about 0.02 g/cm2, which was about 2% relative to the mean BMD for a region within the vertebral body. The latter region included half the BMC of the body, or 24% of the entire vertebra. Results of 4-minute scans on the DPX and 12-minute scans on the DPX-L in 9 subjects were highly correlated (r = 0.98; P less than 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1760765     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  11 in total

1.  Effect of radiographic abnormalities on rate of bone loss from the spine.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; G E Dallal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Bone densitometry for diagnosis and monitoring osteoporosis.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1989-07

Review 3.  Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Uebelhart; F Duboeuf; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt; T Mann
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Vertebral bone mineral density measured laterally by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Lateral dual energy radiography: a new method for measuring vertebral bone density: a preliminary study.

Authors:  R Rupich; R Pacifici; M Griffin; I Vered; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Importance of measurement of spongious vertebral bone mineral density in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C D Jones; A M Laval-Jeantet; M H Laval-Jeantet; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Bone mineral density before and after surgical cure of Cushing's syndrome due to adrenocortical adenoma: prospective study.

Authors:  Akiko Kawamata; Masatoshi Iihara; Takahiro Okamoto; Takao Obara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Age changes of spine density in posterior-anterior and lateral projections in normal women.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden; R W Eberle; M D Denton
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Lateral bone density measurements in osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D J Peacock; P Egger; P Taylor; M I Cawley; C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Del Rio; F Pons; M Huguet; F J Setoain; J Setoain
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

6.  Effect of treadmill exercise on vertebral and tibial bone mineral content and bone mineral density in the aged adult rat: determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J K Yeh; J F Aloia; J M Tierney; S Sprintz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer; H v Lilienfeld-Toal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Relative contribution of vertebral body and posterior arch in female and male lumbar spine peak bone mass.

Authors:  P E Fournier; R Rizzoli; D O Slosman; B Buchs; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The importance of severity of arthrosis for the reliability of bone mineral density measurement in women.

Authors:  Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; Begumhan Baysal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Which vertebrae should be assessed using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Jergas; M Breitenseher; C C Glüer; D Black; P Lang; S Grampp; K Engelke; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.