Literature DB >> 29103097

Vertebral Imaging in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis: a Clinician's Perspective.

Sharon H Chou1,2, Meryl S LeBoff3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture and result in functional decline and excess mortality. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis to identify patients at risk for fragility fractures; however, advances in imaging have expanded the role of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating bone health. RECENT
FINDINGS: The utility of CT and MRI in the assessment of bone density is starting to gain traction, particularly when used opportunistically. DXA, conventional radiography, CT, and MRI can all be used to assess for vertebral fractures, and MRI can determine the acuity of fractures. Finally, advances in imaging allow for non-invasive assessment of measures of bone quality, including microarchitecture, bone strength, and bone turnover, to help identify and treat at-risk patients prior to sustaining a vertebral fracture. CT and MRI techniques remain primarily research tools to assess metabolic bone dysfunction, while use of DXA can be clinically expanded beyond measurement of bone density to assess for vertebral fractures and bone architecture to improve fracture risk assessment and guide treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vertebral bone density; Vertebral fractures; Vertebral imaging; Vertebral structure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29103097     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-017-0404-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.163


  104 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: a comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA.

Authors:  G M Blake; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis.

Authors:  N F Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Multi-detector row CT imaging of vertebral microstructure for evaluation of fracture risk.

Authors:  Masako Ito; Kyoji Ikeda; Masahiko Nishiguchi; Hiroyuki Shindo; Masataka Uetani; Takayuki Hosoi; Hajime Orimo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996-2008: the situation is not improving.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Giangregorio; M Yogendran; M Azimaee; S Morin; C Metge; P Caetano; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The added value of trabecular bone score to FRAX® to predict major osteoporotic fractures for clinical use in Chinese older people: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Y Su; J Leung; D Hans; O Lamy; T Kwok
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.

Authors:  L L Baker; S B Goodman; I Perkash; B Lane; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Central QCT reveals lower volumetric BMD and stiffness in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis, regardless of fracture history.

Authors:  Adi Cohen; Thomas F Lang; Donald J McMahon; X Sherry Liu; X Edward Guo; Chiyuan Zhang; Emily M Stein; David W Dempster; Polly Young; Isra Saeed; Joan M Lappe; Robert R Recker; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Vertebral fractures in steroid dependent asthma and involutional osteoporosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Luengo; C Picado; L Del Rio; N Guañabens; J M Montserrat; J Setoain
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Prevalence of vertebral fractures on chest radiographs of elderly African American and Caucasian women.

Authors:  D Lansdown; B Bennet; S Thiel; O Ahmed; L Dixon; T J Vokes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  F Cosman; S J de Beur; M S LeBoff; E M Lewiecki; B Tanner; S Randall; R Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Bone Phenotyping Approaches in Human, Mice and Zebrafish - Expert Overview of the EU Cost Action GEMSTONE ("GEnomics of MusculoSkeletal traits TranslatiOnal NEtwork").

Authors:  Ines Foessl; J H Duncan Bassett; Åshild Bjørnerem; Björn Busse; Ângelo Calado; Pascale Chavassieux; Maria Christou; Eleni Douni; Imke A K Fiedler; João Eurico Fonseca; Eva Hassler; Wolfgang Högler; Erika Kague; David Karasik; Patricia Khashayar; Bente L Langdahl; Victoria D Leitch; Philippe Lopes; Georgios Markozannes; Fiona E A McGuigan; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Evangelia Ntzani; Ling Oei; Claes Ohlsson; Pawel Szulc; Jonathan H Tobias; Katerina Trajanoska; Şansın Tuzun; Amina Valjevac; Bert van Rietbergen; Graham R Williams; Tatjana Zekic; Fernando Rivadeneira; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.555

2.  Performance of HR-pQCT, DXA, and FRAX in the discrimination of asymptomatic vertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women.

Authors:  Meiling Huang; Vivian Wing-Yin Hung; Tsz Kiu Li; Sheung Wai Law; Yulong Wang; Shangjie Chen; Ling Qin
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  Leveraging the coronary calcium scan beyond the coronary calcium score.

Authors:  Daniel Bos; Maarten J G Leening
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.