Literature DB >> 7638991

Diagnostic outcome of repeated mammography screening.

L G Arnesson1, B Vitak, J C Månson, G Fagerberg, S Smeds.   

Abstract

Mammographic screening for breast cancer within health service routines was evaluated for the years 1987-1992, with special focus on repeated screening during 1989-1992. The overall attendance rate by women aged 40 to 74 years was 82.8%. During 1989-1992 malignancy was found in 2.6/1000 screened women, giving a 87.4% positive predictive rate at surgery and 95.9% efficiency. Among women aged > or = 45 years, the positive predictive rate was > 94%. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy showed invasive cancers in 84% and highly suspected cancer in another 15%; 60% of the lesions were nonpalpable. For first-time (prevalence) screening (1987-1988) the positive predictive rate was 86% and the malignancy yield 6.4/1000. In women aged 40-44 years there were few surgical referrals (1.6%), but the positive predictive rate at surgery was only 48.3%, indicating diagnostic difficulties in young women. The median size of all invasive cancers was 12 mm: 84% were classified as pT1, and 23% had lymph node involvement. Stage II disease was found in 27% of all malignancies. The use of FNA in the diagnostic workup for breast cancer screening is of crucial importance to the maintenance of high positive predictive rates at surgery. Moreover, regular analysis is important even when mammographic screening is incorporated into the routine work of health services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7638991     DOI: 10.1007/bf00299161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  Determining the efficacy of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  First results on mortality reduction in the UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer. UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.

Authors:  J G Tinnemans; T Wobbes; R Holland; J H Hendriks; R F van der Sluis; E J Lubbers; H H de Boer
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987-12

4.  Surgical biopsy of non-palpable mammary lesions. Technique and results.

Authors:  L G Arnesson; G Fagerberg; O Gröntoft; B Lundström
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1986-02

5.  Effects of repeated mammographic screening on breast cancer stage distribution. Results from a randomised study of 92 934 women in a Swedish county.

Authors:  G Fagerberg; L Baldetorp; O Gröntoft; B Lundström; J C Månson; B Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Acta Radiol Oncol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec

6.  Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions.

Authors:  E Azavedo; G Svane; G Auer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Extended role for needle biopsy in the management of carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  A D Baildam; L Turnbull; A Howell; D M Barnes; R A Sellwood
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  [Rates of recall for thorough examination and surgical biopsy following mammographic screening. Experience with the screening program in Florence].

Authors:  S Ciatto; M Rosselli Del Turco
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The predictive value of positive test results in screening for breast cancer by mammography in the Nijmegen programme.

Authors:  P H Peeters; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Women's patterns of participation in mammography screening in Denmark.

Authors:  My von Euler-Chelpin; Anne Helene Olsen; Sisse Njor; Ilse Vejborg; Walter Schwartz; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme.

Authors:  J van Dijck; A Verbeek; J Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Identification of women with early breast cancer by analysis of p43-positive lymphocytes.

Authors:  L Auerbach; M Hellan; M Stierer; A C Rosen; C Ausch; R Obwegeser; E Kubista; G Wolf; H R Rosen; S Panzer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.