Literature DB >> 2900351

First results on mortality reduction in the UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer. UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group.

.   

Abstract

Between 1979 and 1981 the UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer enrolled women aged 45-64 living in eight locations in the United Kingdom. Annual screening by clinical examination of the breast, with mammography in alternate years, was provided over 7 years for 45,841 women; 63,636 were offered teaching in breast self-examination and were provided with a self-referral clinic; and 127,117, for whom no extra services were provided, form a comparison population. Over the 7 years from the start of the trial a reduction in the risk of dying from breast cancer in women offered screening relative to that in the comparison population was observed. The reduction was 14% (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.69-1.08) when no allowance was made for underlying differences in breast cancer mortality between the populations, but rose to 20% (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-1.01) when adjusted for differences in pretrial mortality rates. These differences fall short of statistical significance. No reduction in mortality was observed during the first 5 years but thereafter the gap widens. These results, though in themselves inconclusive, are consistent with the hypothesis that screening can achieve a worthwhile mortality reduction. No difference in mortality has so far been observed between women offered teaching in breast self-examination and the comparison population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2900351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  23 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening: who should be included?

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening?

Authors:  Isabelle Trop; Wilber Deck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer in family practice: A review of the literature.

Authors:  D Snadden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The utility and predictive value of combinations of low penetrance genes for screening and risk prediction of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Hawken; Celia M T Greenwood; Thomas J Hudson; Rafal Kustra; John McLaughlin; Quanhe Yang; Brent W Zanke; Julian Little
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  The impact of reminder letters on attendance for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Hayes; B O'Herlihy; M Hynes; Z Johnson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Development and utilization of mammographic services in Ireland 1985-1991.

Authors:  J Buttimer; D McInerney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Mortality from breast cancer in Ireland prior to the introduction of population-based mammographic screening.

Authors:  M B Codd; J Buttimer; H Comber; J Stack; T F Gorey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  The Stockholm breast cancer screening trial--5-year results and stage at discovery.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; U Glas; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Benign breast disease: the cost of the service and the cost to the patient.

Authors:  M Baum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Breast cancer: early diagnosis of precursor lesions and clinically inapparent carcinoma by fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  J A Linsk
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1991
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.