Literature DB >> 3426934

The predictive value of positive test results in screening for breast cancer by mammography in the Nijmegen programme.

P H Peeters1, A L Verbeek, J H Hendriks, R Holland, M Mravunac.   

Abstract

After 10 years of screening for breast cancer by mammography in Nijmegen, the predictive value of positive screening results (PV+) was evaluated. The percentage of women with breast cancer in the group of referred women (PV+) for women under age 50 was 16-26%, regardless of the number of screening examinations they had. The percentage of women with breast cancer in the group of women who were biopsied was 25-40%, regardless of the number of examinations. For women aged 50 and over the predictive value was 34-57% and 58-90% respectively. It was further evaluated whether characteristics such as age, Quetelet index, parity, and Wolfe-classification could be used to increase the PV+ in women who were identified as positive by mammography. A logistic regression model analysis showed that true-positive and false-positive cases differ significantly only in terms of age and breast complaints. Although the model had a good fit, it could not be used to distinguish false-positive from true-positive test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3426934      PMCID: PMC2001909          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1987.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  16 in total

1.  Screening mammography--potential problems on the horizon.

Authors:  F M Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial.

Authors:  L Tabàr; A Gad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Evaluation of periodic breast cancer screening with mammography. Methodology and early observations.

Authors:  S Shapiro; P Strax; L Venet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1966-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women.

Authors:  B Lundgren; A Helleberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Evidence of breast cancer mortality reduction: aggressive screening in women under age 50.

Authors:  M Moskowitz; P S Gartside
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  The DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Authors:  F de Waard; H J Collette; J J Rombach; E A Baanders-van Halewijn; C Honing
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1984

9.  The Guildford breast screening project.

Authors:  B A Thomas; J L Price; P S Boulter
Journal:  Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-06

10.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: a population-based, randomized trial with mammography as the only screening mode.

Authors:  I Andersson; L Andrén; J Hildell; F Linell; U Ljungqvist; H Pettersson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?

Authors:  C H van Gils; J D Otten; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference?

Authors:  C S Skinner; V J Strecher; H Hospers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Gils; J D Otten; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Diagnostic outcome of repeated mammography screening.

Authors:  L G Arnesson; B Vitak; J C Månson; G Fagerberg; S Smeds
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Breast cancer risk for women with a false positive screening test.

Authors:  P H Peeters; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; A L Verbeek; R Holland; P G Vooijs
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.