Literature DB >> 7638662

Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features.

T Amundsen1, H Weber, F Lilleås, H J Nordal, M Abdelnoor, B Magnaes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of clinical and radiologic characteristics and relationship. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis is frequently used and represents a wide variety of patients with more or less well-defined spinal disorders.
METHODS: One hundred patients who met inclusion criteria were consecutively selected from a neurology department and examined clinically and radiologically with plain radiography, myelography, and computed tomographic imaging.
RESULTS: Duration of complaints was long, and multilevel, bilateral afflictions were common. The dominanting symptoms were sciatica, neurogenic claudication, and low back pain. The clinical findings were modest. Narrowness in the spinal canal was demonstrated radiologically with signs of compression on nerve roots, centrally and/or laterally. The radiologic findings were more extensive than expected from the clinical symptoms and signs. In most patients the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal increased on flexion and decreased on extension of the spine. An exception was demonstrated in 33 patients where extension increased the diameter, usually at one level. Radiologic subgroups of stenosis were found, but their clinical relationship could hardly be identified. No definite association between the degree of narrowing and clinical symptoms was found.
CONCLUSIONS: A clinical picture is demonstrated in 100 patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Different types of stenosis are found radiologically, but their clinical relationships are not identified. The radiologic changes were more extensive than expected from the clinical picture, and the degree of narrowing did not correspond to the degree of clinical affliction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7638662     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199505150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  94 in total

1.  Predicting clinical outcome and length of sick leave after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in Sweden: a multi-register evaluation.

Authors:  Hanna Iderberg; Carl Willers; Fredrik Borgström; Rune Hedlund; Olle Hägg; Hans Möller; Ewald Ornstein; Bengt Sandén; Holger Stalberg; Hans Torevall-Larsson; Tycho Tullberg; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The nerve root sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective, consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Bin Liu; Wei Zhang; Yeqing Zhu; Limin Rong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years--a national analysis of 9,664 operations.

Authors:  Karl-Ake Jansson; Gunnar Németh; F Granath; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Vikram Talwar; Derek P Lindsey; Amy Fredrick; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment.

Authors:  Hasan Oğuz; Funda Levendoğlu; Tunç Cevat Oğün; Aysenur Tantuğ
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Is the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?

Authors:  Rachel A Moses; Wenyan Zhao; Lukas P Staub; Markus Melloh; Thomas Barz; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method.

Authors:  Guen Young Lee; Young Lee Guen; Joon Woo Lee; Woo Lee Joon; Hee Seok Choi; Seok Choi Hee; Kyoung-Jin Oh; Oh Kyoung-Jin; Heung Sik Kang; Sik Kang Heung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Lumbar nerve root occupancy in the foramen in achondroplasia: a morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung Woo Suh; Hae-Ryong Song; Jae Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Christoph Roeder; Jörn Lange; Franz-Georg Smiszek; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.