Literature DB >> 15754213

Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years--a national analysis of 9,664 operations.

Karl-Ake Jansson1, Gunnar Németh, F Granath, P Blomqvist.   

Abstract

Re-operation rates in spinal stenosis surgery vary between 5 and 23%. Most previous studies have been based on selected patients groups. We analysed the 10-year lumbar spinal stenosis re-operation rate from comprehensive Swedish national data during 1987-1999. The mean length of stay decreased from 2 weeks in 1987 to 1 week in 1999. Of 9,664 patients, 628 (6.5%) were re-operated. Within 30 days after the first spinal stenosis operation, 0.15% of the patients were re-operated. The 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year re-operation rates were 2, 5, 8 and 11%, respectively. The rate lowered by 31% over time. Adding a fusion may lower the re-operation risk, an observation which can only be evaluated in randomised trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15754213      PMCID: PMC3489214          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0851-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  The Swedish National Register for lumbar spine surgery: Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  B Strömqvist; B Jönsson; P Fritzell; O Hägg; B E Larsson; B Lind
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-04

2.  Clinical characteristics of recurrent sciatica after lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  B Jönsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone.

Authors:  M W Fox; B M Onofrio; B M Onofrio; A D Hanssen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  N S Schonstrom; N F Bolender; D M Spengler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Long-term results of partial undercutting facetectomy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis.

Authors:  P L Sanderson; C J Getty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo; R B Keller; A M Chapin; D L Patrick; J M Long; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Long-term evaluation of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  A J Caputy; A J Luessenhop
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.

Authors:  D L Kent; D R Haynor; E B Larson; R A Deyo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987-1999.

Authors:  K-A Jansson; P Blomqvist; F Granath; G Németh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis.

Authors:  D Grob; T Humke; J Dvorak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  21 in total

1.  Survivorship analysis of 150 consecutive patients with DIAM™ implantation for surgery of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation.

Authors:  Yoo-Joon Sur; Chae-Gwan Kong; Jong-Beom Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2005.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Unilateral tubular approach for bilateral laminotomy: effect on ipsilateral and contralateral buttock and leg pain.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Jose M Torres-Campa; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Guang-Ting Cong; Innocent Njoku; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub; James D Toombs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-18

5.  Reoperation rates after fenestration for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a 20-year period survival function method analysis.

Authors:  Toshimi Aizawa; Hiroshi Ozawa; Takashi Kusakabe; Yasuhisa Tanaka; Akira Sekiguchi; Ko Hashimoto; Haruo Kanno; Naoki Morozumi; Yushin Ishii; Tetsuro Sato; Eiji Takahashi; Shoichi Kokubun; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Impact and clinical significance of pedicle length on spinal canal and intervertebral foramen area.

Authors:  Chenxi Yuan; Hai Zhu; Dawei Song; Wang Wei; Ruofu Zhu; Xin Mei; Jun Zou; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-01-15

Review 7.  [Lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; M Schneider; B Marquardt; U Liljenqvist; T A Pietilä; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment options.

Authors:  Rolf Kalff; Christian Ewald; Albrecht Waschke; Lars Gobisch; Christof Hopf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Risk for adjacent segment and same segment reoperation after surgery for lumbar stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Patrick Curry; Alan Hilibrand; Christopher Kepler; Jon Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Todd J Albert; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.