Literature DB >> 7634219

Community participation in health care decision making: is it feasible?

M A Singer.   

Abstract

Health care reform strategies proposed by provincial governments include decentralized funding and increased public participation in decision making. These proposals do not give details as to the public participation process, and a number of questions have been raised by the experience of some communities. Which citizens should form the decision-making group? What information do they need? What kinds of decisions should they make? What level of participation should they have? The results of a survey by Abelson and associates (see pages 403 to 412 of this issue) challenge the assumption that "communities" are willing to participate in health-care and social-service decision making. Willingness varied according to the composition of the groups polled, and participants' support for traditional decision makers increased after the complexities of the decision-making process were discussed. However, whereas their study measured willingness to participate at one point in time only, experience gained from Ontario's Better Beginnings, Better Futures project indicates that, given sufficient time, "ordinary" citizens are willing and can acquire the skills needed to decide how resources should be allocated for social services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7634219      PMCID: PMC1487233     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  8 in total

1.  Resident participation in the Better Beginnings, Better Futures prevention project: Part II--Factors that facilitate and hinder involvement.

Authors:  G Cameron; L Peirson; S M Pancer
Journal:  Can J Commun Ment Health       Date:  1994

2.  Resident participation in the Better Beginnings, Better Futures prevention project: Part I--The impacts of involvement.

Authors:  S M Pancer; G Cameron
Journal:  Can J Commun Ment Health       Date:  1994

3.  Community-based action research in a multi-site prevention project: challenges and resolutions.

Authors:  M Reitsma-Street; R Arnold
Journal:  Can J Commun Ment Health       Date:  1994

4.  Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

Authors:  J Dixon; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson; L Southgate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience.

Authors:  J A Kitzhaber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-07

7.  Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.

Authors:  C Ham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-14

8.  Patient choice and patient empowerment in northern European health systems: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  R B Saltman
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.663

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Setting health priorities: community boards accurately reflect the preferences of the community's residents.

Authors:  T Conway; T C Hu; T Harrington
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1997-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.