Literature DB >> 8374459

Priority setting in the NHS: reports from six districts.

C Ham1.   

Abstract

District health authorities must make choices on the use of their funds and the priorities that should be pursued. In future they may be able to place greater weight on the views of local people and evidence on cost effectiveness of different services. This paper reviews developments in a recent study of six district health authorities with an interest in priority setting. On the whole they had avoided excluding services entirely from their contracts; they experienced difficulty in comparing different services, and made more progress by analysing priorities within individual service areas than by comparing quite different services. The absence of information to guide priority setting was a major problem. A major effort had been made to involve the public in decision making, and a range of tools and methods developed to support work on priority setting. The impact of the work done so far has varied; district health authorities are still at an early stage in developing their work on priority setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8374459      PMCID: PMC1678391          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  22 in total

1.  The modern doctor's dilemma: rationing and ethics in healthcare.

Authors:  J Butler
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: what do different methods tell us?

Authors:  D Schopper; A M Torres; J Pereira; C Ammon; N Cuende; M Alonso; A Baylin; A Ronchi; A Rougemont
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions.

Authors:  Doug Martin; Peter Singer
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

4.  Role of users of health care in achieving a quality service.

Authors:  A Hopkins; J Gabbay; J Neuberger
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

5.  Public perceptions of ethical issues regarding adult predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Douglas K Martin; Heather L Greenwood; Jeff Nisker
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-03-14

6.  Public engagement in setting priorities in health care.

Authors:  Rebecca A Bruni; Andreas Laupacis; Douglas K Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Approaches to rationing drugs in hospitals. An Australian perspective.

Authors:  F Bochner; N G Burgess; E D Martin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Consulting the public about health service priorities.

Authors:  C Bowie; A Richardson; W Sykes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28

Review 9.  Community participation in health care decision making: is it feasible?

Authors:  M A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Prioritising resources.

Authors:  N Freemantle; T A Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.