Literature DB >> 8374424

Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience.

J A Kitzhaber1.   

Abstract

How do we decide who should receive the benefits that medical science has to offer? One approach to this decision process, that used by the state of Oregon, is described: who and what are covered, and how health care is financed and delivered, are considered. Oregon's priorities were set on the basis of broad consensus. The objective of health care reform, it was agreed, is to improve, maintain, or restore health--not universal coverage, access to health care, or cost containment. A Health Services Commission was created to consider clinical effectiveness and, through public involvement, to attempt to integrate social values into the priority list. Oregon's legislature can use the list to develop an overall health policy which recognises that health can be maintained only if investments in several related areas are balanced.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Medicaid

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8374424      PMCID: PMC1678226          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Choosing between competing health priorities. A government payer perspective.

Authors:  J Leese
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  [Equal access to medical services over the lifespan].

Authors:  J Fritze
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens B Tempfer; Peter Nowak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy?: results of a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Annalijn Conklin; Zoë Morris; Ellen Nolte
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Approaches to rationing drugs in hospitals. An Australian perspective.

Authors:  F Bochner; N G Burgess; E D Martin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Consulting the public about health service priorities.

Authors:  C Bowie; A Richardson; W Sykes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28

Review 7.  Community participation in health care decision making: is it feasible?

Authors:  M A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis and policy choices: investing in health systems.

Authors:  C J Murray; J Kreuser; W Whang
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  In defence of ageism.

Authors:  A B Shaw
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Setting priorities for the health care sector in Zimbabwe using cost-effectiveness analysis and estimates of the burden of disease.

Authors:  Kristian Schultz Hansen; Glyn Chapman
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2008-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.