Literature DB >> 9120047

Setting health priorities: community boards accurately reflect the preferences of the community's residents.

T Conway1, T C Hu, T Harrington.   

Abstract

Setting priorities remains an important part of healthcare planning and program management. Local community input is often sought in government or publicly sponsored programs. Community policy/advisory boards are a common vehicle to represent the community's interests in program decisions and direction. Questions remain whether community boards accurately represent their communities' views. As part of a planning effort within Chicago and Cook County, Illinois, local District Health Councils (DHCs) have been created to provide assistance and leadership in systemization and improvement of the healthcare in communities with the poorest health status in the region. We sought to discover how closely the perceptions of health priorities of DHC members agreed with those of community members. A structured five-point Likert scale questionnaire of 22 of the most common diseases and conditions known to impact health were used for a random digit dialing telephone interview with a sample of 286 households from three under-served communities. The same interview was repeated with all DHC members (n = 80) representing those communities. Sociodemographic profiles and health-related behaviors were also collected. The results of this interview indicate a close and substantial agreement in priorities between community members and DHC members. Psychosocial conditions such as violence and substance abuse were ranked as the highest priorities by both groups. In contrast, sociodemographics and healthcare behavior differed significantly between DHC members and community's residents. This study demonstrates that these community policy/advisory boards can closely reflect the views of the communities they represent. Attention to their differences in sociodemographics and healthcare experiences with the community may strengthen their role even more.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9120047     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025198924501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  18 in total

1.  Who would you choose to save?

Authors:  N Vetter; P Lewis; S Farrow; M Charny
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1989-08-10

2.  On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

3.  Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

Authors:  J Dixon; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Social history, mental health, and community control.

Authors:  C Hersch
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1972-08

5.  Role of the consumer in regional medical programs.

Authors:  B B Wells
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1970-11

6.  Dealing with limited resources. The Oregon decision to curtail funding for organ transplantation.

Authors:  H G Welch; E B Larson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  C Charles; S DeMaio
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  De Madres a Madres: a community, primary health care program based on empowerment.

Authors:  J McFarlane; J Fehir
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1994

9.  Citizen participation in the governance of community mental health centers.

Authors:  J G Cibulka
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1981

10.  Violence victims' perception of functioning and well-being: a survey from an urban public hospital walk-in clinic.

Authors:  T Conway; T C Hu; C Warshaw; P Kim; A Bullon
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.798

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  O F Norheim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health.

Authors:  K M MacQueen; E McLellan; D S Metzger; S Kegeles; R P Strauss; R Scotti; L Blanchard; R T Trotter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research partnership: points to consider.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Allan Loup; Robert M Nelson; Jeffrey R Botkin; Rhonda Kost; George R Smith; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  When patients govern: federal grant funding and uncompensated care at federally qualified health centers.

Authors:  Brad Wright; Thomas C Ricketts
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-05

5.  Needs, Priorities, and Recommendations for Engaging Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Research: A Community Perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer Cunningham Erves; Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble; Alecia Malin-Fair; Alaina Boyer; Yvonne Joosten; Yolanda C Vaughn; Lisa Sherden; Patrick Luther; Stephania Miller; Consuelo H Wilkins
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-06

6.  Priority Setting in the Polish Health Care System According to Patients' Perspective.

Authors:  Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska; Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Combining evidence and values in priority setting: testing the balance sheet method in a low-income country.

Authors:  Emmanuel Makundi; Lydia Kapiriri; Ole Frithjof Norheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Understanding Multilevel Factors Related to Urban Community Trust in Healthcare and Research.

Authors:  Monica Webb Hooper; Charlene Mitchell; Vanessa J Marshall; Chesley Cheatham; Kristina Austin; Kimberly Sanders; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Lena L Grafton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.