Literature DB >> 8034390

Patient choice and patient empowerment in northern European health systems: a conceptual framework.

R B Saltman1.   

Abstract

The issue of patient choice presents a complicated challenge to publicly operated health systems. Increased patient choice can strengthen the citizen's commitment to traditional welfare state objectives, or alternatively, it can severely damage that commitment, depending upon the design of the choice mechanism and the structural context within which patient choice occurs. For patient choice to be linked to true empowerment, choice must reinforce rather than undercut the accountability of health care providers to the population they serve. This article explores the basic issues involved in empowering patients within publicly operated health systems. The author first reviews the conceptual components that could or should be incorporated within the notion of empowered patients, then examines what would be required to actually empower patients within health systems, defined in terms of expanding not only logistical choice but also clinical influence and decision-making participation. The article concludes with a wide-ranging analysis of the impact of potential policies and mechanisms on the long-term objectives in achieving democratically accountable health care systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8034390     DOI: 10.2190/8WMP-RR2K-ABM7-NVNH

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  10 in total

1.  Editorial.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Impact of breast cancer on Asian American and Anglo American women.

Authors:  M Kagawa-Singer; D K Wellisch; R Durvasula
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1997-12

Review 3.  Wrong answers at the wrong time?

Authors:  R Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Community participation in health care decision making: is it feasible?

Authors:  M A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Patient empowerment in the United States: a critical commentary.

Authors:  Kathleen Johnston Roberts
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Pamela Lopez-Vargas; Martin Howell; Richard Phoon; David Johnson; Denise Campbell; Rowan G Walker; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Treating epistaxis - who cares for a bleeding nose? A secondary data analysis of primary and secondary care.

Authors:  Annina E Althaus; Jonas Lüske; Ulrike Arendt; Michael Dörks; Michael H Freitag; Falk Hoffmann; Kathrin Jobski
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  As predicted by theory: choice and competition in a publicly funded and regulated regional health system yield improved access and cost control.

Authors:  Jonas Wohlin; Clara Fischer; Karin Solberg Carlsson; Sara Korlén; Pamela Mazzocato; Carl Savage; Holger Stalberg; Mats Brommels
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Does app-based unguided self-management improve mental health literacy, patient empowerment and access to care for people with mental health impairments? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  André Kerber; Ina Beintner; Sebastian Burchert; Christine Knaevelsrud
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Patient acceptance of Self-Operated Endovaginal Telemonitoring (SOET): proof of concept.

Authors:  J Gerris; A Geril; P De Sutter
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.