Literature DB >> 7616279

Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws.

T C Ryken1, J D Clausen, V C Traynelis, V K Goel.   

Abstract

The bone mineral density (BMD) of 99 cadaveric cervical vertebral bodies (C3-7) was determined using dual x-ray absorptiometry. The vertebral bodies were randomly assigned to receive either a unicortical (51 bodies) or bicortical (48 bodies) Caspar cervical plating screw. The initial insertion torque was measured using a digital electronic torque wrench, and the force required to withdraw the screw from the vertebral body was determined. The mean BMD for the total group of 99 was 0.787 +/- 0.154 g/cm2, the mean insertion torque was 0.367 +/- 0.243 newton-meters, and the mean pullout force was 210.4 +/- 158.1 newtons. A significant correlation was noted between BMD and torque (p < 0.0001, r = 0.42), BMD and pullout force (p < 0.0001, r = 0.54), and torque and pullout force (p < 0.0001, r = 0.88). Although the BMD of the unicortical and biocortical groups was equivalent (p = 0.92), the insertion torque and pullout force differed significantly (p = 0.02 and p = 0.008, respectively) for the unicortical and bicortical groups. A holding index for each screw and insertion technique was defined as the product of the BMD and insertion torque. The calculated holding index and resultant pullout force were significantly correlated for both techniques of screw insertion (r = 0.92), and a significant difference in holding index was observed with unicortical versus bicortical screw placement (p = 0.04). The determination of BMD and measurement of insertion torque to create a unique holding index provides an assessment of bone-screw interaction and holding strength of the screw, both of which impact on the resultant stability of cervical instrumentation. As the number of cervical plating systems increases, the determination of a holding index for various screws and insertion techniques may assist in the comparison of cervical instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7616279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  12 in total

1.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Maintenance of graft compression in the adult cervical spine.

Authors:  Ciaran Bolger; Maurice Bourlion; Xavier Leroy; Dominique Petit; Gerard Vanacker; Linda McEvoy; Jabir Nagaria
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)--Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Michael Fox; Hudelmaier Martin; Rosmarie Forstner; Peter Augat; Rainer Penzkofer; Christian Pirich; H Kässmann; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical analysis of expansion screws and cortical screws used for ventral plate fixation on the cervical spine.

Authors:  Klaus Röhl; Bernhard Ullrich; Gerd Huber; Michael M Morlock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Tyler West; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanics of Cervical "Skip" Corpectomy Versus Standard Multilevel Corpectomy.

Authors:  Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Eric D Thorhauer; Joon Y Lee; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Self-Drilling Versus Self-Tapping Screws: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Vineeth K Kumar; Kavitha Prasad; Tanvy Sansgiri; K Ranganath; V Shwetha; Kubra Al-Khuteja
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-04-12

9.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for distractive-flexion injury stage 3 of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Thomas Henriques; Bryan W Cunningham; Paul C McAfee; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.384

10.  Biomechanical study of a novel self-locking plate system for anterior cervical fixation.

Authors:  Lifeng Lao; Qianyi Li; Guibin Zhong; Chao Song; Yuanchao Li; Mingze Xu; Zude Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.