Literature DB >> 33613829

Self-Drilling Versus Self-Tapping Screws: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Vineeth K Kumar1, Kavitha Prasad1, Tanvy Sansgiri1, K Ranganath1, V Shwetha2, Kubra Al-Khuteja1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Self-tapping and self-drilling screws are two modalities available for plate fixation. When compared to self-drilling, self-tapping screws have a few drawbacks like screw loosening, thermal osteolysis, equipment dependent, and time-consuming. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of self-tapping and self-drilling screws with relation to plate retention and stability in internal fixation of mandibular fractures using 3D finite element analysis (FEA).
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of screw placement technique on stress concentration and deformation occurring at the screw-bone interface in self-drilling and self-tapping screws.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D computer-aided design modeling system was used to build a trilaminate mandibular bone, self-tapping screw and self-drilling screw, and a 2-holed miniplate with gap that were converted into finite element models using Hypermesh 13.0 software. Material properties and boundary conditions were assigned to these models. Pullout, torque, and torsional forces were applied to evaluate the stress concentration and deformation at the screw-bone interface.
RESULTS: The comparison of stress concentration and deformation values between the two types of screws was interpreted using ANSYS software version 14.5. Results of torque test, pullout test, and torsional test showed maximum Von Mises stress, and deformation around the screw-bone interface was higher in self-tapping screw than in self-drilling screw.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the 3D FEA, the findings provided significant evidence to suggest that self-tapping screws have a greater incidence of fatigue when compared to self-drilling screws as there was more stress distribution and deformation at their screw-bone interface.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FEA of screws; mandible fracture; open reduction and internal fixation; self-drilling screws; self-tapping screws

Year:  2020        PMID: 33613829      PMCID: PMC7868515          DOI: 10.1177/1943387520904212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self-tapping screws.

Authors:  W Heidemann; H Terheyden; K L Gerlach
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Patrick W Hitchon; Matthew D Brenton; Justin K Coppes; Aaron M From; James C Torner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Evaluation of screw loosening on new abutment screws and after successive tightening.

Authors:  Gustavo Seabra Barbosa; João Paulo da Silva-Neto; Paulo Cezar Simamoto-Júnior; Flávio Domingues das Neves; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2011

4.  Self-drilling and self-tapping screws: an ultrastructural study.

Authors:  Juliana Gonçalves Goelzer; Rafael Linard Avelar; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Roberto Hubler; Roger Lanes Silveira; Rosilene Andrea Machado
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Tyler Cox; Markell W Kohn; Thomas Impelluso
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Comparative study of the primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Seil Son; Mitsuru Motoyoshi; Yasuki Uchida; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  AO self-drilling and self-tapping screws in rat calvarial bone: an ultrastructural study of the implant interface.

Authors:  David Sowden; John P Schmitz
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws.

Authors:  T C Ryken; J D Clausen; V C Traynelis; V K Goel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.115

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.