Literature DB >> 7613535

Reliability of the Health Utilities Index--Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire.

M H Boyle1, W Furlong, D Feeny, G W Torrance, J Hatcher.   

Abstract

This study presents information on the test-retest reliability of the Health Utility Index--Mark III (HUI) system used in cycle 6 of the Canadian General Social Survey (GSS). The HUI system used in this reliability study consists of an eight-attribute health status classification system (HSCS) and a function for generating a summary score of health-related quality of life. To estimate test-retest reliability, a stratified random sample of individuals (n = 506) completing GSS telephone interviews during August and September, 1991 were interviewed again 1 month later. Weighting adjustments based on the probability of selection were invoked during the analyses to provide unbiased estimates of test-retest reliability for all GSS respondents in the August-September period. The results indicate that the individual questions, attributes and provisional index scores generally provided reliable information on health status in the GSS. The exceptions to this were limitations in speech and dexterity which were reported very infrequently. Kappa estimates of test-retest reliability for individual questions varied from 0.184 to 0.766. For the eight attributes, kappa estimates varied from 0.137 to 0.728. Using the provisional index scores to quantify health overall, a test-retest reliability of 0.767 was obtained (intra-class correlation coefficient).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7613535     DOI: 10.1007/BF02260864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  11 in total

1.  Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states.

Authors:  G W Torrance; M H Boyle; S P Horwood
Journal:  Oper Res       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.310

2.  The National Population Health Survey: highlights of initial developments.

Authors:  G Catlin; P Will
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.796

Review 3.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  D Feeny; W Furlong; M Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis revisited.

Authors:  P E Shrout; R L Spitzer; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-02

Review 7.  Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures.

Authors:  R D Hays; R Anderson; D Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  D Feeny; W Furlong; R D Barr; G W Torrance; P Rosenbaum; S Weitzman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  48 in total

1.  The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G Hawthorne; J Richardson; R Osborne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Health-related quality of life and regulatory issues in the US and Canada.

Authors:  Judith Glennie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The effect of different methods of collecting data: mail, telephone and filter data collection issues in utility measurement.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  D Feeny; W Furlong; M Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Obesity and the risk of disability in a 12-year cohort study: the role of psychological distress.

Authors:  Genevieve Gariepy; Jianli Wang; Alain Lesage; Norbert Schmitz
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Catharine Craven; Sander L Hitzig; Nicole Mittmann
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  The role of perinatal problems in risk of co-morbid psychiatric and medical disorders in adulthood.

Authors:  Yoko Nomura; Jeanne Brooks-Gunn; Charles Davey; Jacob Ham; William P Fifer
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for assessing spasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Christina Balioussis; Sander L Hitzig; Heather Flett; Luc Noreau; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014

Review 10.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.