Literature DB >> 10259643

Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states.

G W Torrance, M H Boyle, S P Horwood.   

Abstract

A four-attribute health state classification system designed to uniquely categorize the health status of all individuals two years of age and over is presented. A social preference function defined over the health state classification system is required. Standard multi-attribute utility theory is investigated for the task, problems are identified and modifications to the standard method are proposed. The modified methods is field tested in a survey research project involving 112 home interviews. Results are presented and discussed in detail for both the social preference function and the performance of the modified method. A recommended social preference function is presented, complete with a range of uncertainty. The modified method is found to be applicable to the task--no insurmountable difficulties are encountered. Recommendations are presented, based on our experience, for other investigators who may be interested in reapplying the method in other studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 10259643     DOI: 10.1287/opre.30.6.1043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Res        ISSN: 0030-364X            Impact factor:   3.310


  88 in total

1.  Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multiattribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  K Stavem
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.

Authors:  S J Coons; S Rao; D L Keininger; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Linking the health utilities index to National Medical Expenditure Survey data.

Authors:  J A Rizzo; S Pashko; R Friedkin; J Mullahy; J L Sindelar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Measuring handicap: motives, methods, and a model.

Authors:  R H Harwood; S Jitapunkul; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

5.  Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease.

Authors:  R H Harwood; A Rogers; E Dickinson; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

6.  Accuracy of a decision aid for advance care planning: simulated end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Steven R Heverley; Michael J Green
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2011

7.  Health status in 52 long-term survivors of pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  N K Foreman; P M Faestel; J Pearson; J Disabato; M Poole; G Wilkening; E B Arenson; B Greffe; R Thorne
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Understanding differences between self-ratings and population ratings for health in the EuroQOL.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Health-related quality of life in type 1 diabetes without or with symptoms of long-term complications.

Authors:  J Hahl; H Hämäläinen; H Sintonen; T Simell; S Arinen; O Simell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Evaluating podiatry services: testing a treatment specific measure of health status.

Authors:  S Macran; P Kind; J Collingwood; R Hull; I McDonald; L Parkinson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.