Literature DB >> 10155335

Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

D Feeny1, W Furlong, M Boyle, G W Torrance.   

Abstract

In this article, multi-attribute approaches to the assessment of health status are reviewed with a special focus on 2 recently developed systems, the Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark II and Mark III systems. The Mark II system consists of 7 attributes: sensation, mobility, emotion, cognition, self-care, pain and fertility. The Mark III system contains 8 attributes: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition and pain. Each attribute consists of multiple levels of functioning. A combination of levels across the attributes constitutes a health state. The HUI systems are deliberately focused on the fundamental core attributes of health status, and on the capacity of individuals to function with respect to these attributes. Thus, the measure obtained constitutes a pure description of health status, uncontaminated by differential opportunity or preference. Multi-attribute systems provide a compact but comprehensive framework for describing health status for use in population health and programme evaluation studies. An important advantage of such systems is their ability to simultaneously provide detail on an attribute-by-attribute basis and to capture combinations of deficits among attributes. An additional advantage is their compatibility with multi-attribute preference functions, which provide a method for computing a summary health-related quality-of-life score for each health state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155335     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  35 in total

Review 1.  Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  G W Torrance; W Furlong; D Feeny; M Boyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Measurement of health status in the 1990s.

Authors:  D L Patrick; M Bergner
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  The use of female spouse proxies in common symptom reporting.

Authors:  B R Clarridge; M P Massagli
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Toward an operational definition of health.

Authors:  D L Patrick; J W Bush; M M Chen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1973-03

5.  Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index.

Authors:  D L Patrick; J W Bush; M M Chen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Developing multiattribute health indexes.

Authors:  M H Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Choosing measures of health status for individuals in general populations.

Authors:  J E Ware; R H Brook; A R Davies; K N Lohr
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  An approach to measuring and valuing health states.

Authors:  H Sintonen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med Med Econ       Date:  1981-06

Review 9.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Construction of social value or utility-based health indices: the usefulness of factorial experimental design plans.

Authors:  D Cadman; C Goldsmith
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986
View more
  221 in total

1.  Reliability, validity and responsiveness of two multiattribute utility measures in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  K Stavem
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication.

Authors:  J L Bosch; M G Hunink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Fundamentals of clinical economics in health interventions.

Authors:  S Awasthi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Linking the health utilities index to National Medical Expenditure Survey data.

Authors:  J A Rizzo; S Pashko; R Friedkin; J Mullahy; J L Sindelar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Reassessing quality-of-life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; R J Jaeschke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Adjusting distributions of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 utility scores of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Jian Sun
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Measuring the health burden of chronic disease and injury using health adjusted life expectancy and the Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  D G Manuel; S E Schultz; J A Kopec
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Quality of life following surgery for congenital glaucoma: findings of the LVPEI congenital glaucoma registry.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Bharani Seelam; Anil K Mandal
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  The Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (TOMUS): Design and Methodology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Appl Res       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.