CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVES: To describe the relationships between secondary health conditions and health preference in a cohort of adults with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adult men and women (N = 357) with chronic traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (C1-L3 AIS A-D) who were at least 1 year post-injury/onset. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Health Utilities Index-Mark III (HUI-Mark III) and SCI Secondary Conditions Scale-Modified (SCS-M). RESULTS: SCS-M responses for different secondary health conditions were used to create "low impact = absent/mild" and "high impact = moderate/significant" secondary health condition groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in HUI-Mark III scores for different secondary health conditions while controlling for impairment. The mean HUI-Mark III was 0.24 (0.27, range, -0.28 to 1.00). HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.001) in high impact groups for spasms, bladder and bowel dysfunction, urinary tract infections, autonomic dysreflexia, circulatory problems, respiratory problems, chronic pain, joint pain, psychological distress, and depression compared with the low impact groups. As well, HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.05) in high impact groups for pressure sores, unintentional injuries, contractures, heterotopic bone ossification, sexual dysfunction, postural hypotension, cardiac problems, and neurological deterioration than low-impact groups. CONCLUSION: High-impact secondary health conditions are negatively associated with health preference in persons with SCI. Although further work is required, the HUI-Mark III data may be a useful tool for calculating quality-adjusted life years, and advocating for additional resources where secondary health conditions have substantial adverse impact on health.
CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVES: To describe the relationships between secondary health conditions and health preference in a cohort of adults with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adult men and women (N = 357) with chronic traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (C1-L3 AIS A-D) who were at least 1 year post-injury/onset. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Health Utilities Index-Mark III (HUI-Mark III) and SCI Secondary Conditions Scale-Modified (SCS-M). RESULTS: SCS-M responses for different secondary health conditions were used to create "low impact = absent/mild" and "high impact = moderate/significant" secondary health condition groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in HUI-Mark III scores for different secondary health conditions while controlling for impairment. The mean HUI-Mark III was 0.24 (0.27, range, -0.28 to 1.00). HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.001) in high impact groups for spasms, bladder and bowel dysfunction, urinary tract infections, autonomic dysreflexia, circulatory problems, respiratory problems, chronic pain, joint pain, psychological distress, and depression compared with the low impact groups. As well, HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.05) in high impact groups for pressure sores, unintentional injuries, contractures, heterotopic bone ossification, sexual dysfunction, postural hypotension, cardiac problems, and neurological deterioration than low-impact groups. CONCLUSION: High-impact secondary health conditions are negatively associated with health preference in persons with SCI. Although further work is required, the HUI-Mark III data may be a useful tool for calculating quality-adjusted life years, and advocating for additional resources where secondary health conditions have substantial adverse impact on health.
Authors: Chris Blanchard; David Feeny; Jeffrey L Mahon; Robert Bourne; Cecil Rorabeck; Larry Stitt; Susan Webster-Bogaert Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nicole Mittmann; B Catherine Craven; Michael Gordon; D H Robert MacMillan; Magdy Hassouna; Warren Raynard; Anita Kaiser; L Krista Lanctôt; Jean-Eric Tarride Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Chu-Ling Yen; Colleen L McHenry; Michael A Petrie; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: David G T Whitehurst; Nicole Mittmann; Vanessa K Noonan; Marcel F Dvorak; Stirling Bryan Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Joshua D Roth; Joseph J Pariser; John T Stoffel; Sara M Lenherr; Jeremy B Myers; Blayne Welk; Sean P Elliott Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Amanda McIntyre; Stephanie L Marrocco; Samantha A McRae; Lindsay Sleeth; Sander Hitzig; Susan Jaglal; Gary Linassi; Sarah Munce; Dalton L Wolfe Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2020