Literature DB >> 7606905

Knowledge structures and linear separability: integrating information in object and social categorization.

W D Wattenmaker1.   

Abstract

These experiments were designed to determine if the naturalness of abstract category structures varies with content domain. Specifically, the degree to which linear separability constrains categorization was investigated in object and social domains. Linearly separable (LS) categories are categories that can be perfectly partitioned on the basis of a weighted, additive combination of component information. Across a wide variety of stimulus materials and classification tasks LS structures were found to be more compatible with social than object materials. In sorting tasks, participants were more likely to sum characteristic features and form LS categories with social materials. In learning tasks, LS structures were easier to learn with social materials but nonlinearly separable structures were easier to learn with object materials. This interaction between category structure and content domain was attributed to differences in the types of knowledge and integration strategies that were activated. In object conditions, strategies that were inconsistent with adding independent features were observed (e.g., focusing on single dimensions, using configural properties, and relying on analogy). In social conditions, however, summing the evidence and learning LS structures appeared to be a natural strategy. It was concluded that the structure of knowledge varies with domain, and consequently it will be difficult to formulate domain general constraints in terms of abstract structural properties such as linear separability. Differences between object and social categorization systems are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7606905     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Effect of causal structure on category construction.

Authors:  W K Ahn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  The acquisition of category structure in unsupervised learning.

Authors:  A S Kaplan; G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

3.  The influence of prior knowledge in intentional versus incidental concept learning.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

4.  Putting together prior knowledge, verbal arguments, and observations in category learning.

Authors:  E Heit
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

5.  Induction and category coherence.

Authors:  M E Lassaline; G L Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

6.  Feature integration in natural language concepts.

Authors:  James A Hampton; Gert Storms; Claire L Simmons; Daniel Heussen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

7.  Dissociable neural correlates of stereotypes and other forms of semantic knowledge.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Contreras; Mahzarin R Banaji; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Expectations about stimulus structure in implicit learning.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

9.  Linear separability, irrelevant variability, and categorization difficulty.

Authors:  Luke A Rosedahl; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.