Literature DB >> 24214809

Induction and category coherence.

M E Lassaline1, G L Murphy.   

Abstract

In studies of category formation, subjects rarely construct family resemblance categories. Instead, they divide objects into categories using a single dimension. This is a puzzling result given the widely accepted view that natural categories are organized in terms of a family resemblance principle. The observation that natural categories support inductive inferences is used here to test the hypothesis that family resemblance categories would be constructed if stimuli were first used to generate inductive inferences. In two experiments, subjects answered either induction questions, which made interproperty relationships more salient, or frequency questions, which required information only about individual properties, before they performed a sorting task. Subjects were likely to produce family resemblance sorts if they had first answered induction questions but not if they had answered frequency questions.

Year:  1996        PMID: 24214809     DOI: 10.3758/BF03210747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  4 in total

1.  Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction.

Authors:  D L Medin; W D Wattenmaker; S E Hampson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Linear separability and concept learning: context, relational properties, and concept naturalness.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker; G I Dewey; T D Murphy; D L Medin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Knowledge structures and linear separability: integrating information in object and social categorization.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Predictions from uncertain categorizations.

Authors:  G L Murphy; B H Ross
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.468

  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Effect of causal structure on category construction.

Authors:  W K Ahn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  The acquisition of category structure in unsupervised learning.

Authors:  A S Kaplan; G L Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

3.  The effects of category use on learned categories.

Authors:  B H Ross
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

4.  Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation.

Authors:  J Loewenstein; L Thompson; D Gentner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

5.  A further investigation of category learning by inference.

Authors:  Amy L Anderson; Brian H Ross; Seth Chin-Parker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

6.  Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: a test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift.

Authors:  G L Murphy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

7.  Blocking in category learning.

Authors:  Lewis Bott; Aaron B Hoffman; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

8.  Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.

Authors:  Matthew E Lancaster; Ryan Shelhamer; Donald Homa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

9.  Sorting out categories: incremental learning of category structure.

Authors:  Michael Diaz; Brian H Ross
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

10.  Premise typicality as feature inference decision-making in perceptual categories.

Authors:  Emma L Morgan; Mark K Johansen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-10-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.