Literature DB >> 19933458

Feature integration in natural language concepts.

James A Hampton1, Gert Storms, Claire L Simmons, Daniel Heussen.   

Abstract

Two experiments measured the joint influence of three key sets of semantic features on the frequency with which artifacts (Experiment 1) or plants and creatures (Experiment 2) were categorized in familiar categories. For artifacts, current function outweighed both originally intended function and current appearance. For biological kinds, appearance and behavior, an inner biological function, and appearance and behavior of offspring all had similarly strong effects on categorization. The data were analyzed to determine whether an independent cue model or an interactive model best accounted for how the effects of the three feature sets combined. Feature integration was found to be additive for artifacts but interactive for biological kinds. In keeping with this, membership in contrasting artifact categories tended to be superadditive, indicating overlapping categories, whereas for biological kinds, it was subadditive, indicating conceptual gaps between categories. It is argued that the results underline a key domain difference between artifact and biological concepts.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19933458     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

Review 1.  Are there kinds of concepts?

Authors:  D L Medin; E B Lynch; K O Solomon
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Essentialist beliefs about social categories.

Authors:  N Haslam; L Rothschild; D Ernst
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-03

3.  Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits.

Authors:  L K Tyler; H E Moss; M R Durrant-Peatfield; J P Levy
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts.

Authors:  Wim Ruts; Gert Storms; James Hampton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

5.  Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural.

Authors:  Zachary Estes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

Review 6.  Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories.

Authors:  J A Hampton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-01

7.  Preschoolers favor the creator's label when reasoning about an artifact's function.

Authors:  Vikram K Jaswal
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-09-26

Review 8.  The essentialist aspect of naive theories.

Authors:  M Strevens
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-02-14

9.  Knowledge structures and linear separability: integrating information in object and social categorization.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories.

Authors:  C W Kalish
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Psychological essentialist reasoning and perspective taking during reading: a donkey is not a zebra, but a plate can be a clock.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Mary Wakefield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  On domain differences in categorization and context variety.

Authors:  Steven Verheyen; Daniel Heussen; Gert Storms
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

3.  The real deal: what judgments of really reveal about how people think about artifacts.

Authors:  Barbara C Malt; Michael R Paquet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

4.  The Hidden Strengths of Weak Theories.

Authors:  Frank Keil
Journal:  Anthropol Philos       Date:  2011-01-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.