Literature DB >> 15915802

Expectations about stimulus structure in implicit learning.

Emmanuel M Pothos1.   

Abstract

In two experiments, artificial grammar learning was used to create learning tasks of identical symbolic complexity that differed in terms of the instructions and the appearance of the stimuli. In Experiment 1, the stimuli were letter strings that appeared in either upper- or lowercase; however, letter case was irrelevant to the learning task. Participants were unable to take into account the instruction to ignore letter case. In Experiment 2, the stimuli were sequences of cities that corresponded to the routes of a traveling salesman. It was assumed that participants would adopt the expectation that the salesman would prefer short journeys. When the structure of the stimuli was inconsistent with this expectation, performance on the learning task was inhibited. The results suggest that there are circumstances in which explicit expectations about the structure of a set of stimuli can affect implicit learning of the stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915802     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  The influence of prior knowledge in intentional versus incidental concept learning.

Authors:  W D Wattenmaker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Beyond dissociation logic: evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  P A Higham; J R Vokey; J L Pritchard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-12

3.  The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  E M Pothos; T M Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Category learning with minimal prior knowledge.

Authors:  A S Kaplan; G L Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process.

Authors:  B R Newell; J E Bright
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-11

6.  Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition.

Authors:  Richard J Tunney; David R Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

7.  Implicit (and explicit) learning: acting adaptively without knowing the consequences.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; R L Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  D R Shanks; T Johnstone; L Staggs
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-02

9.  Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning.

Authors:  E J Wisniewski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning.

Authors:  G L Murphy; P D Allopenna
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  An entropy model for artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-17

2.  Artificial grammar learning of melody is constrained by melodic inconsistency: Narmour's principles affect melodic learning.

Authors:  Martin Rohrmeier; Ian Cross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Does complexity matter? Meta-analysis of learner performance in artificial grammar tasks.

Authors:  Rachel Schiff; Pesia Katan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.