Literature DB >> 7599058

Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice.

A Cull1, M Stewart, D G Altman.   

Abstract

An audit was carried out of 51 oncology patients referred to a clinical psychology service to identify the characteristics of patients selected for referral and to assess change following psychological intervention. A survey was conducted of an unselected sample of oncology patients representative of the workload of the oncology department from which the referrals came, to determine the prevalence of comparable psychosocial problems among patients who were not referred for help and to assess whether doctors were aware of the problems patients reported. Data were collected using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) and Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scales and a problem checklist devised for this study. Referred patients were significantly more anxious and depressed (P < 0.001) and showed poorer adjustment on MAC scales than the surveyed sample, but 30% of the latter group warranted assessment for anxiety and 23% for depression. The number of psychosocial problems of their severity. Intervention was clinically significant mood disorder irrespective of the specific problems of their severity. Intervention was associated with a significant improvement in distress and problems for referred patients by the time of discharge. Psychosocial problems were often undetected by staff even in referred patients. The checklist is a feasible screening method for potentially remediable problems which are cumulatively a significant contributor to cancer patients' distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7599058      PMCID: PMC2034106          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  13 in total

1.  A model for the development of psychosocial interventions.

Authors:  G H Christ
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1991

2.  Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale.

Authors:  M Watson; S Greer; J Young; Q Inayat; C Burgess; B Robertson
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Improving the detection of psychiatric problems in cancer patients.

Authors:  P Maguire
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend.

Authors:  J Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  Liaison psychiatry in a breast cancer unit.

Authors:  A J Ramirez
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A two-year naturalistic follow-up of depressed patients treated with cognitive therapy, pharmacotherapy and a combination of both.

Authors:  I M Blackburn; K M Eunson; S Bishop
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.839

8.  Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

Authors:  M L Slevin; H Plant; D Lynch; J Drinkwater; W M Gregory
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Counselling and communication in oncology.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Evaluation of adjuvant psychological therapy for clinically referred cancer patients.

Authors:  S Greer; S Moorey; J Baruch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Shim; Kyung-Sook Lee; Jong-Hyock Park; Jae-Hyun Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Reducing the unmet needs of patients with colorectal cancer: a feasibility study of The Pathfinder Volunteer Program.

Authors:  Michelle L Macvean; Victoria M White; Sarah Pratt; Suzanne Grogan; Robert Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice.

Authors:  E P Wright; M Kiely; C Johnston; A B Smith; A Cull; P J Selby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Palliative care symptom assessment for patients with cancer in the emergency department: validation of the Screen for Palliative and End-of-life care needs in the Emergency Department instrument.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Michael A Gisondi; Chih-Hung Chang; D Mark Courtney; Kirsten G Engel; Linda Emanuel; Tammie Quest
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  The good news about giving bad news to patients.

Authors:  Neil J Farber; Susan Y Urban; Virginia U Collier; Joan Weiner; Ronald G Polite; Elizabeth B Davis; E Gil Boyer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: are computers the way forward in a clinical setting?

Authors:  Allison Boyes; Sallie Newell; Afaf Girgis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Caregivers' participation in the oncology clinic visit mediates the relationship between their information competence and their need fulfillment and clinic visit satisfaction.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; Ming-Yuan Chih; David H Gustafson; Susan Dinauer; James F Cleary
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-28

Review 8.  Central nervous system toxicity from cancer treatment.

Authors:  Terri Armstrong; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Schneider; Anne Moyer; Sarah Knapp-Oliver; Stephanie Sohl; Dolores Cannella; Valerie Targhetta
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-09-27

10.  Development and implementation of a clinician reporting system for advanced stage cancer: initial lessons learned.

Authors:  Lori L Dubenske; Ming-Yuan Chih; Susan Dinauer; David H Gustafson; James F Cleary
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.