Allison Boyes1, Sallie Newell, Afaf Girgis. 1. Cancer Education Research Program, The Cancer Council NSW, University of Newcastle, Australia. Allison.Boyes@newcastle.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the agreement between anxiety, depression and supportive care needs data obtained using a touchscreen computer survey with traditional pen-and-paper surveys. METHODS: The sample consisted of 1,304 consecutive patients attending the medical or radiation oncology outpatient department in two public cancer treatment centres. Of the 357 eligible patients, 355 (99%) consented to participate and 350 (98%) completed both touchscreen computer and pen-and-paper versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-short). RESULTS: Simple kappa values indicated moderate agreement (X = 0.57) between the two modes of survey administration for most HADS items. Simple kappa coefficients indicated only fair agreement (X = 0.28) when a simplified response option format was used in the computerised SCNS-short. When the paper and computerised survey used the same response format, simple kappa coefficients increased and indicated moderate agreement (X = 0.44) for most SCNS-short items. Kappa coefficients indicated at least moderate agreement (kappa > 0.41) in identifying patients with elevated levels of anxiety and depression; there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients identified with elevated levels of anxiety and depression according to computer survey compared to paper survey. Prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficients indicated at least moderate agreement (X = 0.79) in identifying participants with moderate/high levels of unmet needs. However, participants tended to report lower levels of unmet needs with a simplified response format in the computerised SCNS-short compared to the paper survey. This was not observed when the response format of the computerised SCNS-short replicated the paper survey. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages that computerised surveys offer for simplifying survey presentation, current results suggest the need to exactly replicate the question and response option format of the original paper survey to ensure the data collected are equivalent. This finding is particularly important given the potential application of computerised surveys in the clinical setting to quickly assess and identify patients' concerns requiring intervention by health care providers.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the agreement between anxiety, depression and supportive care needs data obtained using a touchscreen computer survey with traditional pen-and-paper surveys. METHODS: The sample consisted of 1,304 consecutive patients attending the medical or radiation oncology outpatient department in two public cancer treatment centres. Of the 357 eligible patients, 355 (99%) consented to participate and 350 (98%) completed both touchscreen computer and pen-and-paper versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-short). RESULTS: Simple kappa values indicated moderate agreement (X = 0.57) between the two modes of survey administration for most HADS items. Simple kappa coefficients indicated only fair agreement (X = 0.28) when a simplified response option format was used in the computerised SCNS-short. When the paper and computerised survey used the same response format, simple kappa coefficients increased and indicated moderate agreement (X = 0.44) for most SCNS-short items. Kappa coefficients indicated at least moderate agreement (kappa > 0.41) in identifying patients with elevated levels of anxiety and depression; there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients identified with elevated levels of anxiety and depression according to computer survey compared to paper survey. Prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficients indicated at least moderate agreement (X = 0.79) in identifying participants with moderate/high levels of unmet needs. However, participants tended to report lower levels of unmet needs with a simplified response format in the computerised SCNS-short compared to the paper survey. This was not observed when the response format of the computerised SCNS-short replicated the paper survey. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages that computerised surveys offer for simplifying survey presentation, current results suggest the need to exactly replicate the question and response option format of the original paper survey to ensure the data collected are equivalent. This finding is particularly important given the potential application of computerised surveys in the clinical setting to quickly assess and identify patients' concerns requiring intervention by health care providers.
Authors: Cornelia M Ruland; Harald H Holte; Jo Røislien; Cathy Heaven; Glenys A Hamilton; Jørn Kristiansen; Heidi Sandbaek; Stein O Kvaløy; Line Hasund; Misoo C Ellison Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Amna Husain; Lisa Barbera; Doris Howell; Rahim Moineddin; Andrea Bezjak; Jonathan Sussman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-12-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrew G Matthew; Kristen L Currie; Paul Ritvo; Robert Nam; Michael E Nesbitt; Robin W Kalnin; John Trachtenberg Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jesse R Fann; Donna L Berry; Seth Wolpin; Mary Austin-Seymour; Nigel Bush; Barbara Halpenny; William B Lober; Ruth McCorkle Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Karen M Gil; Heidi E Frasure; Michael P Hopkins; Eric L Jenison; Vivian E von Gruenigen Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2005-01-17 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Andrew G Matthew; Kristen L Currie; Jane Irvine; Paul Ritvo; Daniel Santa Mina; Leah Jamnicky; Robert Nam; John Trachtenberg Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 3.186