Literature DB >> 18579837

Development and implementation of a clinician reporting system for advanced stage cancer: initial lessons learned.

Lori L Dubenske1, Ming-Yuan Chih, Susan Dinauer, David H Gustafson, James F Cleary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Innovative approaches can strengthen patient-caregiver-clinician information exchange and more effectively address the physical and psychosocial challenges of advanced disease. This study reports initial findings from implementation of the Clinician Report (CR)-a patient and caregiver status report tool accessible by the oncology clinic team.
DESIGN: The CR tracks and communicates essential information from cancer patients and caregivers to the oncology team. The CR conveys patient symptoms, emotional strain, and key concerns. MEASUREMENTS: Authors used a model developed to explain acceptance, implementation, and sustainability of Interactive Health Communication Systems (IHCS) to evaluate implementation of the new CR system. The study carried out qualitative analyses of interviews with clinicians regarding their experience utilizing the Clinician Report.
RESULTS: Primary CR benefits included enhancement of patients' clinic visit experiences, greater caregiver involvement, and facilitation of earlier interventions. Challenges included CR functional issues, users' desire for greater depth of information, user privacy concerns, and limited patient use. These findings are discussed using parameters of the implementation model. Limitations of this study include its small clinician sample size, which represented only a portion of existing organizational settings in which CR systems might be implemented.
CONCLUSION: Though in its early implementation stages, the CR demonstrates the potential to positively impact care delivery in the cancer clinic setting, particularly by facilitating earlier interventions and improving patient-caregiver-clinician communication both during and between clinic visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18579837      PMCID: PMC2528046          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  42 in total

1.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Empowering patients using computer based health support systems.

Authors:  D H Gustafson; F M McTavish; E Boberg; B H Owens; C Sherbeck; M Wise; S Pingree; R P Hawkins
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

Review 3.  Discussing palliative care with patients. ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.

Authors:  B Lo; T Quill; J Tulsky
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  A model of empathic communication in the medical interview.

Authors:  A L Suchman; K Markakis; H B Beckman; R Frankel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Rationale for the timing of health-related quality-of-life (HQL) assessments in oncological palliative therapy.

Authors:  D Osoba
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Physiological and physical concomitants of caregiving: introduction.

Authors:  P P Vitaliano
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1997

7.  Unfinished business: assessing the spiritual needs of hospice clients.

Authors:  J R Dudley; C Smith; M B Millison
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Opening the black box: how do physicians communicate about advance directives?

Authors:  J A Tulsky; G S Fischer; M R Rose; R M Arnold
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Patient participation in decision-making.

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; P Ward
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  16 in total

1.  Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.

Authors:  Kuang-Yi Wen; David H Gustafson; Robert P Hawkins; Patricia F Brennan; Susan Dinauer; Pauley R Johnson; Tracy Siegler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Adapting an in-person patient-caregiver communication intervention to a tailored web-based format.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Ann Schafenacker; Kathryn L C Barr; Ian T Moore; Jake Fisher; Kathryn McCurdy; Holly A Derry; Edward W Saunders; Lawrence C An; Laurel Northouse
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Web-based cancer communication and decision making systems: connecting patients, caregivers, and clinicians for improved health outcomes.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; David H Gustafson; Bret R Shaw; James F Cleary
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Psychosocial interventions for patients and caregivers in the age of new communication technologies: opportunities and challenges in cancer care.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Cindy L Carmack; Michael A Diefenbach
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-01-28

6.  Patient-reported symptoms and quality of life integrated into clinical cancer care.

Authors:  Donna L Berry
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.315

7.  An eHealth system supporting palliative care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  David H Gustafson; Lori L DuBenske; Kang Namkoong; Robert Hawkins; Ming-Yuan Chih; Amy K Atwood; Roberta Johnson; Abhik Bhattacharya; Cindy L Carmack; Anne M Traynor; Toby C Campbell; Mary K Buss; Ramaswamy Govindan; Joan H Schiller; James F Cleary
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving.

Authors:  Erin E Kent; Julia H Rowland; Laurel Northouse; Kristin Litzelman; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Nonniekaye Shelburne; Catherine Timura; Ann O'Mara; Karen Huss
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Communicating advanced cancer patients' symptoms via the Internet: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials examining caregiver preparedness, physical burden, and negative mood.

Authors:  Ming-Yuan Chih; Lori L DuBenske; Robert P Hawkins; Roger L Brown; Susan K Dinauer; James F Cleary; David H Gustafson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.762

10.  CHESS improves cancer caregivers' burden and mood: results of an eHealth RCT.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; David H Gustafson; Kang Namkoong; Robert P Hawkins; Amy K Atwood; Roger L Brown; Ming-Yuan Chih; Fiona McTavish; Cindy L Carmack; Mary K Buss; Ramaswamy Govindan; James F Cleary
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.