Literature DB >> 3348942

Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

M L Slevin1, H Plant, D Lynch, J Drinkwater, W M Gregory.   

Abstract

The extent to which a doctor or health professional can make a valid assessment of a patient's quality of life, anxiety and depression was investigated in a series of cancer patients. Doctors and patients filled out the same forms, viz. the Karnofsky, Spitzer, Linear Analogue Self Assessment Scales and a series of simple scales designed for this study, at the same time. Correlations between the two sets of scores were poor, suggesting that the doctors could not accurately determine what the patients felt. A further study examining the reproducibility of these scales demonstrated considerable variability in results between different doctors. It is concluded that if a reliable and consistent method of measuring quality of life in cancer patients is required, it must come from the patients themselves and not from their doctors and nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3348942      PMCID: PMC2246701          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1988.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales.

Authors:  R C Aitken
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1969-10

2.  Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Investigation of the Karnofsky Performance Status as a measure of quality of life.

Authors:  A Grieco; C J Long
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Assessment of the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  I R Gough; C M Furnival; L Schilder; W Grove
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-08

5.  Evaluating quality-of-life in oncology patients: pilot observations.

Authors:  C A Presant; C Klahr; L Hogan
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 6.  The quality of life of cancer patients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J C de Haes; F C van Knippenberg
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  A new scale for assessing patients' psychosocial adjustment to medical illness.

Authors:  G R Morrow; R J Chiarello; L R Derogatis
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  T J Priestman; M Baum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  On the receiving end--patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  A Coates; S Abraham; S B Kaye; T Sowerbutts; C Frewin; R M Fox; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-02
View more
  161 in total

1.  The Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey: normative data for the Irish population.

Authors:  C Blake; M B Codd; Y M O'Meara
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making.

Authors:  A Towle; W Godolphin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

Review 3.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

Review 4.  Are quality of life measures patient centred?

Authors:  A J Carr; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

5.  The SF36 as an outcome measure of services for end stage renal failure.

Authors:  J P Wight; L Edwards; J Brazier; S Walters; J N Payne; C B Brown
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

6.  Randomized trials with quality of life endpoints: are doctors' ratings of patients' physical symptoms interchangeable with patients' self-ratings?

Authors:  R J Stephens; P Hopwood; D J Girling; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  [Chemotherapy in the elderly].

Authors:  G Lümmen; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Quality of life: philosophical question or clinical reality?

Authors:  M L Slevin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-22

9.  The functional assessment of cancer therapy-BRM (FACT-BRM): a new tool for the assessment of quality of life in patients treated with biologic response modifiers.

Authors:  J Bacik; M Mazumdar; B A Murphy; D L Fairclough; S Eremenco; T Mariani; R J Motzer; D Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Patient satisfaction with adjustable transobturator male system in the Iberian multicenter study.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Ignacio Arance; Antonio Ojea; Manuel Carballo; Andrés Rodríguez; Javier Pereira; Miguel Rebassa; Antoine Teyrouz; Gregorio Escribano; Fernando Teba; Blanca Madurga; Francisco E Martins; Francisco Cruz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.