Literature DB >> 7585611

Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas.

T Ried1, K E Just, H Holtgreve-Grez, S du Manoir, M R Speicher, E Schröck, C Latham, H Blegen, A Zetterberg, T Cremer.   

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization serves as a screening test for regions of copy number changes in tumor genomes. We have applied the technique to map DNA gains and losses in 33 cases of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary breast tumors (13 fibroadenomas and 10 diploid and 10 aneuploid carcinomas). No genomic imbalances were found in fibroadenomas. Recurrent findings in adenocarcinomas include copy number increases for chromosomes 1q (14 of 20 samples), 8q (10 of 20), 17q (5 of 20), 6p (3 of 20), 13q (3 of 20), and 16p (3 of 20), and copy number decreases for chromosomes 22 (7 of 20), 17p (6 of 20), and 20 (3 of 20). Regional high level copy number increases were observed on chromosome bands 1q32, 8p11, 8q24, 10p, 11q13, 12p, 12q15, 17q11-12, and 17q22-24. The majority of the samples were studied for gene amplification of c-myc, c-erbB2, cycD1, and int-2 by means of Southern blot analysis. The comparison with DNA ploidy measurements revealed a different distribution and a significantly higher number of chromosomal aberrations in aneuploid tumors than in diploid tumors and in fibroadenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7585611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  54 in total

1.  Spontaneous transformation of murine epithelial cells requires the early acquisition of specific chromosomal aneuploidies and genomic imbalances.

Authors:  Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Karen Hathcock; Nicole E McNeil; David Mack; Daniel Hoeppner; Rea Ravin; Turid Knutsen; Raluca Yonescu; Danny Wangsa; Kathleen Dorritie; Linda Barenboim; Yue Hu; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Patterns of Chromosomal Aberrations in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Marian Grade; Michael J Difilippantonio; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2015

3.  Molecular cytogenetics of mouse models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Ried; Kathy Dorritie; Zoë Weaver; Danny Wangsa; Michael J Difilippantonio; Cristina Montagna
Journal:  Breast Dis       Date:  2004

4.  Aneuploidy, TP53 mutation, and amplification of MYC correlate with increased intratumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Johanna Oltmann; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Leanora S Hernandez; Rüdiger Meyer; Irianna Torres; Yue Hu; Natalie Doberstein; J Keith Killian; David Petersen; Yuelin Jack Zhu; Daniel C Edelman; Paul S Meltzer; Russell Schwartz; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Gert Auer; Jens K Habermann; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  DNA copy number amplifications in human neoplasms: review of comparative genomic hybridization studies.

Authors:  S Knuutila; A M Björkqvist; K Autio; M Tarkkanen; M Wolf; O Monni; J Szymanska; M L Larramendy; J Tapper; H Pere; W El-Rifai; S Hemmer; V M Wasenius; V Vidgren; Y Zhu
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Genetic changes in intraductal breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  T Kuukasjärvi; M Tanner; S Pennanen; R Karhu; O P Kallioniemi; J Isola
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 7.  The consequences of chromosomal aneuploidy on the transcriptome of cancer cells.

Authors:  Thomas Ried; Yue Hu; Michael J Difilippantonio; B Michael Ghadimi; Marian Grade; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-06

Review 8.  Of mice and Myc: c-Myc and mammary tumorigenesis.

Authors:  M Hunter Jamerson; Michael D Johnson; Robert B Dickson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Chromosome 8 numerical aberrations in stage II invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation with patient outcome and poor prognosis.

Authors:  Yutaka Tagawa; Toru Yasutake; Yasushi Ikuta; Tadayuki Oka; Ryusuke Terada
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression.

Authors:  Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Lissa Y Berroa Garcia; Amanda Bradley; Clarymar Ortiz-Melendez; Woei-Jyh Lee; Rebecca Christensen; Sheila A Prindiville; Kathleen A Calzone; Peter W Soballe; Yue Hu; Salim A Chowdhury; Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.