Literature DB >> 29181861

Aneuploidy, TP53 mutation, and amplification of MYC correlate with increased intratumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Johanna Oltmann1, Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad2, Leanora S Hernandez2, Rüdiger Meyer2, Irianna Torres2, Yue Hu2, Natalie Doberstein1, J Keith Killian2, David Petersen2, Yuelin Jack Zhu2, Daniel C Edelman2, Paul S Meltzer2, Russell Schwartz3, E Michael Gertz4, Alejandro A Schäffer4, Gert Auer5, Jens K Habermann1, Thomas Ried2.   

Abstract

The clinical course of breast cancer varies from one patient to another. Currently, the choice of therapy relies on clinical parameters and histological and molecular tumor features. Alas, these markers are informative in only a subset of patients. Therefore, additional predictors of disease outcome would be valuable for treatment stratification. Extensive studies showed that the degree of variation of the nuclear DNA content, i.e., aneuploidy, determines prognosis. Our aim was to further elucidate the molecular basis of aneuploidy. We analyzed five diploid and six aneuploid tumors with more than 20 years of follow-up. By performing FISH with a multiplexed panel of 10 probes to enumerate copy numbers in individual cells, and by sequencing 563 cancer-related genes, we analyzed how aneuploidy is linked to intratumor heterogeneity. In our cohort, none of the patients with diploid tumors died of breast cancer during follow-up in contrast to four of six patients with aneuploid tumors (mean survival 86.4 months). The FISH analysis showed markedly increased genomic instability and intratumor heterogeneity in aneuploid tumors. MYC gain was observed in only 20% of the diploid cancers, while all aneuploid cases showed a gain. The mutation burden was similar in diploid and aneuploid tumors, however, TP53 mutations were not observed in diploid tumors, but in all aneuploid tumors in our collective. We conclude that quantitative measurements of intratumor heterogeneity by multiplex FISH, detection of MYC amplification and TP53 mutation could augment prognostication in breast cancer patients. Published 2018. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FISH; MYC amplification; TP53 mutations; aneuploidy; breast cancer; intratumor heterogeneity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29181861      PMCID: PMC5807164          DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  36 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability, tolerance of mitotic errors and multidrug resistance are promoted by tetraploidization in human cells.

Authors:  Anastasia Y Kuznetsova; Katarzyna Seget; Giuliana K Moeller; Mirjam S de Pagter; Jeroen A D M de Roos; Milena Dürrbaum; Christian Kuffer; Stefan Müller; Guido J R Zaman; Wigard P Kloosterman; Zuzana Storchová
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Is carcinogenesis a form of speciation?

Authors:  Peter Duesberg; Daniele Mandrioli; Amanda McCormack; Joshua M Nicholson
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer?

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Vanessa Almendro; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  The gene expression signature of genomic instability in breast cancer is an independent predictor of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Jana Doering; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Uwe J Roblick; Nana K Bündgen; Daniel Nicorici; Ulrike Kronenwett; Shruti Rathnagiriswaran; Rama K R Mettu; Yan Ma; Stefan Krüger; Hans-Peter Bruch; Gert Auer; Nancy L Guo; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability.

Authors:  Ulrike Kronenwett; Sören Huwendiek; Carin Ostring; Neil Portwood; Uwe J Roblick; Yudi Pawitan; Ayodele Alaiya; Roland Sennerstam; Anders Zetterberg; Gert Auer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  dbNSFP v2.0: a database of human non-synonymous SNVs and their functional predictions and annotations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Liu; Xueqiu Jian; Eric Boerwinkle
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Prognostic significance of DNA measurements in 409 consecutive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A G Fallenius; G U Auer; J M Carstensen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Isochromosomes in neoplasia.

Authors:  F Mertens; B Johansson; F Mitelman
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Inferring models of multiscale copy number evolution for single-tumor phylogenetics.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; E Michael Gertz; Darawalee Wangsa; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  8 in total

1.  Joint Clustering of Single-Cell Sequencing and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Data for Reconstructing Clonal Heterogeneity in Cancers.

Authors:  Xuecong Fu; Haoyun Lei; Yifeng Tao; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Irianna Torres; Michael Dean; Thomas Ried; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  High Levels of Chromosomal Copy Number Alterations and TP53 Mutations Correlate with Poor Outcome in Younger Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ayla Koçak; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Annette Lischka; Daniela Hirsch; David Fiedler; Yue Hu; Natalie Doberstein; Irianna Torres; Wei-Dong Chen; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Jutta Kirfel; Gert Auer; Jens K Habermann; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Chromosomal instability in untreated primary prostate cancer as an indicator of metastatic potential.

Authors:  Eric T Miller; Sungyong You; Radu M Cadaneanu; Minhyung Kim; Junhee Yoon; Sandy T Liu; Xinmin Li; Lorna Kwan; Jennelle Hodge; Michael J Quist; Catherine S Grasso; Michael S Lewis; Beatrice S Knudsen; Michael R Freeman; Isla P Garraway
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Assessing the contribution of tumor mutational phenotypes to cancer progression risk.

Authors:  Yifeng Tao; Ashok Rajaraman; Xiaoyue Cui; Ziyi Cui; Haoran Chen; Yuanqi Zhao; Jesse Eaton; Hannah Kim; Jian Ma; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  CENP-A overexpression promotes aneuploidy with karyotypic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Roshan L Shrestha; Austin Rossi; Darawalee Wangsa; Ann K Hogan; Kimberly S Zaldana; Evelyn Suva; Yang Jo Chung; Chelsea L Sanders; Simone Difilippantonio; Tatiana S Karpova; Baktiar Karim; Daniel R Foltz; Daniele Fachinetti; Peter D Aplan; Thomas Ried; Munira A Basrai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data.

Authors:  Haoyun Lei; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Xuecong Fu; Yifeng Tao; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Irianna Torres; Guibo Li; Liqin Xu; Yong Hou; Kui Wu; Xulian Shi; Michael Dean; Thomas Ried; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.931

7.  Friend leukemia virus integration 1 is a predictor of poor prognosis of breast cancer and promotes metastasis and cancer stem cell properties of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Xu Yan; Yu Yu; Lingyu Li; Naifei Chen; Wei Song; Hua He; Jie Dong; Xiangliang Liu; Jiuwei Cui
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  A Comparative Analysis of Tumors and Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in 145 Advanced Cancer Patients Annotated by 3 Core Cellular Processes.

Authors:  Kristian Larson; Radhamani Kannaiyan; Ritu Pandey; Yuliang Chen; Hani M Babiker; Daruka Mahadevan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.