Literature DB >> 22426433

The consequences of chromosomal aneuploidy on the transcriptome of cancer cells.

Thomas Ried1, Yue Hu, Michael J Difilippantonio, B Michael Ghadimi, Marian Grade, Jordi Camps.   

Abstract

Chromosomal aneuploidies are a defining feature of carcinomas, i.e., tumors of epithelial origin. Such aneuploidies result in tumor specific genomic copy number alterations. The patterns of genomic imbalances are tumor specific, and to a certain extent specific for defined stages of tumor development. Genomic imbalances occur already in premalignant precursor lesions, i.e., before the transition to invasive disease, and their distribution is maintained in metastases, and in cell lines derived from primary tumors. These observations are consistent with the interpretation that tumor specific genomic imbalances are drivers of malignant transformation. Naturally, this precipitates the question of how such imbalances influence the expression of resident genes. A number of laboratories have systematically integrated copy number alterations with gene expression changes in primary tumors and metastases, cell lines, and experimental models of aneuploidy to address the question as to whether genomic imbalances deregulate the expression of one or few key genes, or rather affect the cancer transcriptome more globally. The majority of these studies showed that gene expression levels follow genomic copy number. Therefore, gross genomic copy number changes, including aneuploidies of entire chromosome arms and chromosomes, result in a massive deregulation of the transcriptome of cancer cells. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin in time and space. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22426433      PMCID: PMC4737485          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  96 in total

1.  Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling.

Authors:  T R Hughes; C J Roberts; H Dai; A R Jones; M R Meyer; D Slade; J Burchard; S Dow; T R Ward; M J Kidd; S H Friend; M J Marton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances.

Authors:  S Solinas-Toldo; S Lampel; S Stilgenbauer; J Nickolenko; A Benner; H Döhner; T Cremer; P Lichter
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Characteristic chromosomal abnormalities in biopsies and lymphoid-cell lines from patients with Burkitt and non-Burkitt lymphomas.

Authors:  L Zech; U Haglund; K Nilsson; G Klein
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1976-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Comparative genomic hybridization reveals a specific pattern of chromosomal gains and losses during the genesis of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  T Ried; R Knutzen; R Steinbeck; H Blegen; E Schröck; K Heselmeyer; S du Manoir; G Auer
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Integrative analysis of DNA copy number and gene expression in metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma identifies genes associated with poor survival.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Yan Liu; Pei Wang; Wenhong Fan; Tessa C Rue; Melissa P Upton; John R Houck; Pawadee Lohavanichbutr; David R Doody; Neal D Futran; Lue Ping Zhao; Stephen M Schwartz; Chu Chen; Eduardo Méndez
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 27.401

6.  Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells.

Authors:  Madhvi B Upender; Jens K Habermann; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn; J Carl Barrett; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability.

Authors:  Ulrike Kronenwett; Sören Huwendiek; Carin Ostring; Neil Portwood; Uwe J Roblick; Yudi Pawitan; Ayodele Alaiya; Roland Sennerstam; Anders Zetterberg; Gert Auer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Chromosome instability, chromosome transcriptome, and clonal evolution of tumor cell populations.

Authors:  ChongFeng Gao; Kyle Furge; Julie Koeman; Karl Dykema; Yanli Su; Mary Lou Cutler; Adam Werts; Pete Haak; George F Vande Woude
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Authors:  D Pinkel; R Segraves; D Sudar; S Clark; I Poole; D Kowbel; C Collins; W L Kuo; C Chen; Y Zhai; S H Dairkee; B M Ljung; J W Gray; D G Albertson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Global associations between copy number and transcript mRNA microarray data: an empirical study.

Authors:  Wenjuan Gu; Hyungwon Choi; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-02-09
View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Patterns of Chromosomal Aberrations in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Marian Grade; Michael J Difilippantonio; Jordi Camps
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2015

2.  The shock of being united and symphiliosis. Another lesson from plants?

Authors:  Yuri Lazebnik
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Trichostatin A preferentially reverses the upregulation of gene-expression levels induced by gain of chromosome 7 in colorectal cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Floryne O Buishand; Eric Cardin; Yue Hu; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Genomic Changes in Normal Breast Tissue in Women at Normal Risk or at High Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David N Danforth
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-08-17

5.  ASXL3 Is a Novel Pluripotency Factor in Human Respiratory Epithelial Cells and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Vivek Shukla; Mahadev Rao; Hongen Zhang; Jeanette Beers; Darawalee Wangsa; Danny Wangsa; Floryne O Buishand; Yonghong Wang; Zhiya Yu; Holly S Stevenson; Emily S Reardon; Kaitlin C McLoughlin; Andrew S Kaufman; Eden C Payabyab; Julie A Hong; Mary Zhang; Sean Davis; Daniel Edelman; Guokai Chen; Markku M Miettinen; Nicholas P Restifo; Thomas Ried; Paul A Meltzer; David S Schrump
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  LGR5 positivity defines stem-like cells in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Hirsch; Nick Barker; Nicole McNeil; Yue Hu; Jordi Camps; Katherine McKinnon; Hans Clevers; Thomas Ried; Timo Gaiser
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  A transcriptional and metabolic signature of primary aneuploidy is present in chromosomally unstable cancer cells and informs clinical prognosis.

Authors:  Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Single-cell genetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer reveals enormous tumor heterogeneity yet conserved genomic imbalances and gain of MYC during progression.

Authors:  Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Lissa Y Berroa Garcia; Amanda Bradley; Clarymar Ortiz-Melendez; Woei-Jyh Lee; Rebecca Christensen; Sheila A Prindiville; Kathleen A Calzone; Peter W Soballe; Yue Hu; Salim A Chowdhury; Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Aneuploidy, oncogene amplification and epithelial to mesenchymal transition define spontaneous transformation of murine epithelial cells.

Authors:  Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Nicole E McNeil; Ming Yi; Quang-Tri Nguyen; Yue Hu; Danny Wangsa; David L Mack; Amanda B Hummon; Chanelle Case; Eric Cardin; Robert Stephens; Michael J Difilippantonio; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 10.  Centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability and cancer: mechanistic, clinical and therapeutic issues.

Authors:  Marco Raffaele Cosenza; Alwin Krämer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.