Literature DB >> 12835515

Chromosome 8 numerical aberrations in stage II invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation with patient outcome and poor prognosis.

Yutaka Tagawa1, Toru Yasutake, Yasushi Ikuta, Tadayuki Oka, Ryusuke Terada.   

Abstract

Aberrations in chromosome 8 are common in breast cancer. However, the relationship between numerical aberrations of chromosome 8 and clinical behavior (especially prognosis) in breast cancer is not well understood. In this study, a total of 40 specimens of stage II invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a chromosome 8 centromere-specific probe and DNA flow cytometry (stage IIA: 20 cases; stage IIB: 20 cases). All cases were followed for at least 5.7 yr (mean: 7.5 yr; median: 7.7 yr) after surgery or until death. Single (loss), double, and triple or more signals (gain) of chromosome 8 were found in 7.6 +/- 3.5% (range: 2-16%; median: 7%), 53.7 +/- 13.2% (range: 25-81%, median: 53%), and 38.7 +/- 13.2% (range: 17-65%, median: 38%), respectively, of tumors. The frequencies of chromosome 8 gain and disomy correlated with patient outcome (respectively p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). When median ratios of chromosome 8 loss, disomy, and gain were used as the cutoff values, the survival curves revealed that patients in the low-frequency group survived significantly longer than those in the high-frequency group for chromosome 8 gain (p < 0.05), and patients in the high-frequency group survived significantly longer than those in the low-frequency group for chromosome 8 disomy (p < 0.05). Poor prognosis was not associated with age, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, histologic type, TNM stage, estrogen-receptor status, progesterone- receptor status, or DNA ploidy. Our results suggest that the frequencies of chromosome 8 gain and disomy is a potentially useful parameter for predicting prognosis of stage II IDCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12835515     DOI: 10.1385/MO:20:2:127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  26 in total

1.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Genetic alteration of the c-myc protooncogene (MYC) in human primary breast carcinomas.

Authors:  C Escot; C Theillet; R Lidereau; F Spyratos; M H Champeme; J Gest; R Callahan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment of chromosome 8 copy number in stage I and stage II infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  A Afify; H F Mark
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1997-09

Review 4.  Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  F Forozan; R Karhu; J Kononen; A Kallioniemi; O P Kallioniemi
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 5.  MYC oncogenes and human neoplastic disease.

Authors:  C E Nesbit; J M Tersak; E V Prochownik
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-05-13       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene.

Authors:  D J Slamon; G M Clark; S G Wong; W J Levin; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Estrogen receptors and breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Stanford; M Szklo; L A Brinton
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Isola; O P Kallioniemi; L W Chu; S A Fuqua; S G Hilsenbeck; C K Osborne; F M Waldman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas.

Authors:  T Ried; K E Just; H Holtgreve-Grez; S du Manoir; M R Speicher; E Schröck; C Latham; H Blegen; A Zetterberg; T Cremer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.

Authors:  O P Kallioniemi; A Kallioniemi; J Piper; J Isola; F M Waldman; J W Gray; D Pinkel
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genome-based versus gene-based theory of cancer: possible implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Natasa Todorovic-Rakovic
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Undifferentiated Sarcomas in Children Harbor Clinically Relevant Oncogenic Fusions and Gene Copy-Number Alterations: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Theodore W Laetsch; Angshumoy Roy; Lin Xu; Jennifer O Black; Cheryl M Coffin; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; Sheri L Spunt; Douglas S Hawkins; Julia A Bridge; D Williams Parsons; Stephen X Skapek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Ductal approaches to assessment and management of women at high risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  Imogen Locke; Gillian Mitchell; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  DNA polymerase β deficiency is linked to aggressive breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis of gene copy number, mRNA and protein expression in multiple cohorts.

Authors:  Tarek M A Abdel-Fatah; Roslin Russell; Devika Agarwal; Paul Moseley; Michael Ayotunde Abayomi; Christina Perry; Nada Albarakati; Graham Ball; Stephen Chan; Carlos Caldas; Ian O Ellis; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 6.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.