Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The mammography and prostate-specific antigen controversies: implications for patient-physician encounters and public policy.

× No keyword cloud information.

25 in total

1. Screening for prostate cancer: commentary on the recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:
Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 1994 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.043

2. Using prostate-specific antigen to diagnose prostate cancer: sailing in uncharted waters.

Authors: P C Walsh
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 25.391

3. Mammography before age 50 years?

Authors: J C Bailar
Journal: JAMA Date: 1988-03-11 Impact factor: 56.272

4. Screening and informed consent.

Authors: J M Lee
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245

5. Evidence-based practice guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors: H C Sox; S H Woolf
Journal: JAMA Date: 1993-05-26 Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6. Preventive care guidelines: 1991. American College of Physicians. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. United States Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors: R S Hayward; E P Steinberg; D E Ford; M F Roizen; K W Roach
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1991-05-01 Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7. Prostate cancer: screening, diagnosis, and management.

Authors: M B Garnick
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1993-05-15 Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8. Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography: their roles in diagnosing early prostate cancer.

Authors: M R Cupp; J E Oesterling
Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 7.616

9. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors: A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal: CMAJ Date: 1992-11-15 Impact factor: 8.262

10. The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.

Authors: D M Eddy; V Hasselblad; W McGivney; W Hendee
Journal: JAMA Date: 1988-03-11 Impact factor: 56.272

3 in total

1. To screen or not to screen: What is the question?

Authors: R Aronowitz
Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 5.128

2. Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.

Authors: A S Dunn; K V Shridharani; W Lou; J Bernstein; C R Horowitz
Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 5.043

3. Do physician outcome judgments and judgment biases contribute to inappropriate use of treatments? Study protocol.

Authors: Jamie C Brehaut; Roy Poses; Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Lott; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Elise Bassin; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2007-06-07 Impact factor: 7.327

3 in total