Literature DB >> 1423087

Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

A B Miller1, C J Baines, T To, C Wall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of annual screening with mammography, physical examination of the breasts and the teaching of breast self-examination in reducing the rate of death from breast cancer among women aged 40 to 49 years on entry.
DESIGN: Individually randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Fifteen urban centres in Canada with expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: Women with no history of breast cancer and no mammography in the previous 12 months were randomly assigned to undergo either annual mammography and physical examination (MP group) or usual care after an initial physical examination (UC group). The 50,430 women enrolled from January 1980 through March 1985 were followed for a mean of 8.5 years. DATA COLLECTION: Derived from the participants by initial and annual self-administered questionnaires, from the screening examinations, from the patients' physicians, from the provincial cancer registries and by record linkage to the Canadian National Mortality Data Base. Expert panels evaluated histologic and death data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of referral from screening, rates of detection of breast cancer from screening and from community care, nodal status, tumour size, and rates of death from all causes and from breast cancer.
RESULTS: Over 90% of the women in each group attended the screening sessions or returned the annual questionnaires, or both, over years 2 to 5. The characteristics of the women in the two groups were similar. Compared with the Canadian population, the participants were more likely to be married, have fewer children, have more education, be in a professional occupation, smoke less and have been born in North America. The rate of screen-detected breast cancer on first examination was 3.89 per 1000 in the MP group and 2.46 per 1000 in the UC group; more node-positive tumours were found in the MP group than in the UC group. During years 2 through 5 the ratios of observed to expected cases of invasive breast cancer were 1.26 in the MP group and 1.02 in the UC group. Of the women with invasive breast cancer through to 7 years, 191 and 157 women in the MP and UC groups respectively had no node involvement, 55 and 43 had one to three nodes involved, 47 and 23 had four or more nodes involved, and 38 and 49 had an unknown nodal status. There were 38 deaths from breast cancer in the MP group and 28 in the UC group. The ratio of the proportions of death from breast cancer in the MP group compared with those in the UC group was 1.36 (95% confidence interval 0.84 to 2.21). The survival rates were similar in the two groups. The highest survival rate occurred among women whose cancer had been detected by mammography alone.
CONCLUSION: The study was internally valid, and there was no evidence of randomization bias. Screening with yearly mammography and physical examination of the breasts detected considerably more node-negative, small tumours than usual care, but it had no impact on the rate of death from breast cancer up to 7 years' follow-up from entry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1423087      PMCID: PMC1336543     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  34 in total

1.  Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.

Authors:  S J CUTLER; F EDERER
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1958-12

2.  UICC project on screening for cancer: report of the workshop on screening for breast cancer. Meeting held in Helsinki, Finland, on April 7-9, 1986.

Authors:  N E Day; C J Baines; J Chamberlain; M Hakama; A B Miller; P Prorok
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Audit procedures in the National Breast Screening Study: mammography interpretation.

Authors:  C J Baines; D V McFarlane; C Wall
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.248

4.  The search for risk factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Shapiro; P Strax; L Venet; R Fink
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1968-05

5.  Selection of women at high risk of breast cancer for initial screening.

Authors:  M T Schechter; A B Miller; C J Baines; G R Howe
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

6.  Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the breast cancer detection demonstration project [published errtum appears in J Natl Cancer Inst 1989 Oct 4;81(19):1513].

Authors:  A S Morrison; J Brisson; N Khalid
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Five-year experience with single-view mammography randomized controlled screening in Sweden.

Authors:  L Tabár; E Akerlund; A Gad
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1984

8.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

9.  The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women.

Authors:  A B Miller; G R Howe; C Wall
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 0.825

10.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial.

Authors:  L Tabár; G Faberberg; N E Day; L Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  100 in total

1.  Cigarette smoking and risk of benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast.

Authors:  T E Rohan
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Does mammography save lives?

Authors:  John Hoey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Mammography screening among women aged 40-49 years shows no benefit.

Authors:  John Hoey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The Epidemiology and Aetiology of Female Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Rita K Schmutzler
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Re. Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Enthusiasm or uncertainty: small area variations in the use of mammography services in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  V Goel; K Iron; J I Williams
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation.

Authors:  Susan E Jelinski; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Christina M Bancej
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.