Literature DB >> 2012359

Preventive care guidelines: 1991. American College of Physicians. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. United States Preventive Services Task Force.

R S Hayward1, E P Steinberg, D E Ford, M F Roizen, K W Roach.   

Abstract

Clinicians increasingly are urged to integrate preventive services into their clinical practices. To facilitate this process, several groups have developed practice guidelines for preventing disease in asymptomatic patients. In this paper, we compare and contrast preventive guidelines from the American College of Physicians (ACP), the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (CTF), the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and other well-known authorities. We chose these groups because they based their recommendations on explicit methods that include critical appraisal of the pertinent literature. Recommendations from these authorities usually are consistent with each other. Moreover, the ACP, CTF, and USPSTF all favor a shift away from the relatively simple classification of patients by age and sex for general preventive interventions to the more complex stratification of patients by additional risk factors and the formulation of a selective prevention strategy that is specific to each risk profile. Some guidelines, particularly the criteria used to define patients who are at increased risk for preventable disease and who should have more intensive surveillance, are difficult to interpret. Further research is needed to address some areas of disagreement and ambiguity. In addition, new tools must be developed to help physicians apply preventive guidelines, particularly those that require noting many patient-specific characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2012359     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  23 in total

1.  Preventive care of older urban American Indians and Alaska natives in primary care.

Authors:  D Buchwald; R Furman; S Ashton; S Manson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristen S Willard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-04

3.  Computer-generated mailed reminders for influenza immunization: a clinical trial.

Authors:  W P Moran; K Nelson; J L Wofford; R Velez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Asymptomatic hypertriglyceridaemia.

Authors:  S B Hulley; A L Avins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-15

5.  On sale: future health care. The paradox of discounting.

Authors:  T G Ganiats
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-05

6.  Cancer screening in older adults.

Authors:  J M Walsh
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-05

Review 7.  The mammography and prostate-specific antigen controversies: implications for patient-physician encounters and public policy.

Authors:  A S Brett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Preventive Care for the Elderly: Uncovering the unmet needs of this population.

Authors:  L Mallery; K Rockwood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Documentation of preventive screening interventions by general practitioners: a retrospective chart audit.

Authors:  Emmanuel Ngwakongnwi; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Hude Quan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study.

Authors:  L E Duijm; G L Guit; J H Hendriks; J O Zaat; W P Mali
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.