Literature DB >> 11165455

Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.

A S Dunn1, K V Shridharani, W Lou, J Bernstein, C R Horowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening mammography for younger women and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement have controversial benefits and known potential adverse consequences. While providing informed consent and eliciting patient preference have been advocated for these tests, little is known about how often these discussions take place or about barriers to these discussions.
METHODS: We administered a survey to medical house staff and attending physicians practicing primary care. The survey examined physicians' likelihood of discussing screening mammography and PSA testing, and factors influencing the frequency and quality of these discussions.
RESULTS: For the three scenarios, 16% to 34% of physicians stated that they do not discuss the screening tests. The likelihood of having a discussion was significantly associated with house staff physicians' belief that PSA screening is advantageous; house staff and attending physicians' intention to order a PSA test, and attending physicians' intention to order a mammogram; and a controversial indication for screening. The most commonly identified barriers to discussions were lack of time, the complexity of the topic, and a language barrier.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians report they often do not discuss cancer screening tests with their patients. Our finding that physicians' beliefs and intention to order the tests, and extraneous factors such as time constraints and a language barrier, are associated with discussions indicates that some patients may be inappropriately denied the opportunity to choose whether to screen for breast and prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11165455      PMCID: PMC4848038          DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00288-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  32 in total

1.  Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  The mammography and prostate-specific antigen controversies: implications for patient-physician encounters and public policy.

Authors:  A S Brett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Improving screening for cancer in the primary care setting. Where do we need to go and how can we get there?

Authors:  D Atkins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  So much to do, so little time.

Authors:  D Liss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Contentious screening decisions: does the choice matter?

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Defining and updating the American Cancer Society guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: prostate and endometrial cancers.

Authors:  C Mettlin; G Jones; H Averette; S B Gusberg; G P Murphy
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Screening mammography in women younger than 50 years of age.

Authors:  H C Sox
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Early diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  G S Gerber; G W Chodak
Journal:  Important Adv Oncol       Date:  1993

10.  Health promotion in primary care: physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications.

Authors:  G Makoul; P Arntson; T Schofield
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  42 in total

1.  Concordance of couples' prostate cancer screening recommendations from a decision analysis.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Robert J Volk; Murray D Krahn; Alvah R Cass; Jawaria Gilani; Susan C Weller; Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach.

Authors:  Barak Gaster; Kelly Edwards; Susan Brown Trinidad; Thomas H Gallagher; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Primary Care Physicians' Support of Shared Decision Making for Different Cancer Screening Decisions.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Richard F Brown; Michael P Pignone; Scott Ratliff; L Aubree Shay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Physician-patient discussions about prostate-specific antigen test use among African-American men.

Authors:  Bernice B Tannor; Louie Ross
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Moving towards shared decision making in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Deborah L Helitzer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Primary care colorectal cancer screening recommendation patterns: associated factors and screening outcomes.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; Elizabeth G Liles; David H Smith; Ana G Rosales; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; David M Mosen; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  The clinical breast exam: a skill that should not be abandoned.

Authors:  Teresa Bryan; Erin Snyder
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.

Authors:  Bryan Leyva; Alexander Persoskie; Allison Ottenbacher; Jada G Hamilton; Jennifer D Allen; Sarah C Kobrin; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Caroline S Dorfman; Randi M Williams; Elisabeth C Kassan; Sara N Red; David L Dawson; William Tuong; Elizabeth R Parker; Janet Ohene-Frempong; Kimberly M Davis; Alexander H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Marc D Schwartz; Mary B Fishman; Carmella Cole; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  A patient recall program to enhance decisions about prostate cancer screening: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas D Denberg; Manisha Bhide; Alyssa Soenksen; Trina Mizrahi; Laura Shields; Chen-Tan Lin
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.