Literature DB >> 7521824

The care and fitting of Naka-Rushton functions to electroretinographic intensity-response data.

M L Severns1, M A Johnson.   

Abstract

We developed an automated system to estimate parameters of the Naka-Rushton function based on a heuristic model of the electroretinogram intensity-response series. Data from a population of patients with central retinal vein occlusion were used to examine the ability of the derived parameters to predict the development of neovascularization of the iris. The predictive performance of this automated system in central retinal vein occlusion is comparable to that of a human expert.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7521824     DOI: 10.1007/bf01371129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Comparative electroretinographic studies in congenital night blindness and total color blindness.

Authors:  G GOODMAN; H BORNSCHEIN
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1957-08

2.  The luminance-response function of the dark-adapted human electroretinogram.

Authors:  N S Peachey; K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Electroretinogram parameters at presentation as predictors of rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion patients.

Authors:  M E Breton; G E Quinn; S S Keene; J C Dahmen; A J Brucker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion: electroretinographic findings.

Authors:  M A Johnson; S Marcus; M J Elman; T J McPhee
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-03

5.  The variability of the b-wave of the electroretinogram with stimulus luminance.

Authors:  M L Severns; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The A-wave of the human electroretinogram and rod receptor function.

Authors:  D C Hood; D G Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Characterization of the electroretinographic scotopic B-wave amplitude in diabetic and normal subjects.

Authors:  E B Roecker; E Pulos; G H Bresnick; M Severns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; L Wu; D Finkelstein; C Perry; S J Starr; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05-30       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  21 in total

1.  Retinal sensitivity loss in third-generation n-3 PUFA-deficient rats.

Authors:  Harrison S Weisinger; James A Armitage; Brett G Jeffrey; Drake C Mitchell; Toru Moriguchi; Andrew J Sinclair; Richard S Weisinger; Norman Salem
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.880

2.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Rhodopsin signaling mediates light-induced photoreceptor cell death in rd10 mice through a transducin-independent mechanism.

Authors:  Jesse C Sundar; Daniella Munezero; Caitlyn Bryan-Haring; Thamaraiselvi Saravanan; Angelica Jacques; Visvanathan Ramamurthy
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Spectral sensitivity, luminous sensitivity, and temporal resolution of the visual systems in three sympatric temperate coastal shark species.

Authors:  Mieka Kalinoski; Amy Hirons; Andrij Horodysky; Richard Brill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats.

Authors:  Christine T Nguyen; Tina I Tsai; Zheng He; Algis J Vingrys; Pei Y Lee; Bang V Bui
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  ISCEV extended protocol for the stimulus-response series for the dark-adapted full-field ERG b-wave.

Authors:  Mary A Johnson; Brett G Jeffrey; André M V Messias; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The variability of the b-wave of the electroretinogram with stimulus luminance.

Authors:  M L Severns; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Comparison of guinea pig electroretinograms measured with bipolar corneal and unipolar intravitreal electrodes.

Authors:  B V Bui; H S Weisinger; A J Sinclair; A J Vingrys
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Toluene inhalation exposure for 13 weeks causes persistent changes in electroretinograms of Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  William K Boyes; Mark Bercegeay; Laura Degn; Tracey E Beasley; Paul A Evansky; Jean Claude Mwanza; Andrew M Geller; Charles Pinckney; T Michael Nork; Philip J Bushnell
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  Electrophysiological evaluation of retinal photoreceptor function after repeated bevacizumab injections.

Authors:  Andreas Stahl; Nicolas Feltgen; Antje Fuchs; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.