Literature DB >> 8119107

The variability of the b-wave of the electroretinogram with stimulus luminance.

M L Severns1, M A Johnson.   

Abstract

We measured the variability of the b-wave of the electroretinogram as a function of stimulus luminance in two young normal individuals. We also estimated b-wave variability by examining residuals from Naka-Rushton curves fit to intensity-response data. The change of variability with amplitude was similar with both techniques. The standard deviation of b-wave amplitude rose with b-wave amplitude at low stimulus intensities. At higher intensities, the standard deviation of b-wave amplitude became constant. The point at which the standard deviation became constant was Log K for the eye, as determined by fitting the data with the Naka-Rushton equation. These changes suggest that the mechanisms underlying the growth of the b-wave with luminance change near Log K.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8119107     DOI: 10.1007/bf01203661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  11 in total

1.  Standardized full-field electroretinography. Normal values and their variation with age.

Authors:  D G Birch; J L Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-11

2.  The luminance-response function of the dark-adapted human electroretinogram.

Authors:  N S Peachey; K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The normal B-potential in the single-flash clinical electroretinogram. A computer technique study of the influence of sex and age.

Authors:  H Peterson
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1968

4.  The photomyoclonic reflex: an artefact in the clinical electroretinogram.

Authors:  M A Johnson; R W Massof
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Characterization of the electroretinographic scotopic B-wave amplitude in diabetic and normal subjects.

Authors:  E B Roecker; E Pulos; G H Bresnick; M Severns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  A computational model of the amplitude and implicit time of the b-wave of the human ERG.

Authors:  D C Hood; D G Birch
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Electroretinographic findings in iris neovascularization due to acute central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  M A Johnson; T J McPhee
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06

9.  The effect of age on human cone and rod ganzfeld electroretinograms.

Authors:  R G Weleber
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The care and fitting of Naka-Rushton functions to electroretinographic intensity-response data.

Authors:  M L Severns; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  The flicker electroretinogram interocular amplitude ratio is a strong prognostic indicator of neovascularization in patients with central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hsi-Kung Kuo; Ming-Tse Kuo; Yung-Jen Chen; Pei-Chang Wu; Chih-Hsin Chen; Yi-Hao Chen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A controlled study comparing visual function in patients treated with vigabatrin and tiagabine.

Authors:  G L Krauss; M A Johnson; S Sheth; N R Miller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Discrete Wavelet Transform Analysis of the Electroretinogram in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Paul A Constable; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; Mercedes Gauthier; Irene O Lee; David H Skuse; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  The care and fitting of Naka-Rushton functions to electroretinographic intensity-response data.

Authors:  M L Severns; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.