Literature DB >> 7492160

A non-electrostatic spacer for aerosol delivery.

H Bisgaard1, J Anhøj, B Klug, E Berg.   

Abstract

A pear shaped non-electrostatic spacer, composed of steel with a volume of 250 ml and equipped with a facemask containing integrated inlet and outlet valves for inspiration and expiration, was compared with three plastic spacers. The plastic spacers were primed with repeated puffs from a budesonide pressurised metered dose inhaler (p-MDI) to minimise the electrostatic charge on the plastic. The procedure prolonged the half life (t1/2) of the aerosol in the Nebuhaler from nine to 32 seconds. A normal cleaning procedure reduced the aerosol t1/2 back to baseline. The t1/2 of the aerosol in the metal spacer was 27 seconds and independent of the use of p-MDI. In vitro the maximum dose of budesonide from a p-MDI, expressed as a percentage of the nominal dose, was 56% from the non-electrostatic spacer, 61% from the Nebuhaler, 45% from the Babyhaler, and 30% from the AeroChamber. In 124 children, age 6 months to 6 years, suspected to have asthma the non-electrostatic spacer delivered a mean total dose of budesonide aerosol of 39% of the nominal dose, which was significantly higher than the Babyhaler (28%), the Nebuhaler (21%), and the AeroChamber (19%). These differences were most pronounced in children younger than 4 years. The improved dose delivery from the small volume non-electrostatic spacer is probably related to the non-electrostatic spacer material and the valves which assured unidirectional airflow from the spacer without adding any dead space in the inspiratory channel. The non-electro-static spacer should improve the cost effectiveness of aerosol treatment and, as the counteracting effects of proming and recharging of the plastic from cleaning are avoided, should deliver a more reliable dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492160      PMCID: PMC1511307          DOI: 10.1136/adc.73.3.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  10 in total

1.  Spacer device with face mask attachment for giving bronchodilators to infants with asthma.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; A D Milner; A Swarbrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-21

2.  Inhaled budesonide for chronic wheezing under 18 months of age.

Authors:  V Noble; N R Ruggins; M L Everard; A D Milner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Improvement in sodium cromoglycate delivery from a spacer device by use of an antistatic lining, immediate inhalation, and avoiding multiple actuations of drug.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; J Lynch; M Cant; C Robertson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Are nebulizers obsolete for administering asthma medications to infants and children?

Authors:  M T Newhouse
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1993-05

5.  Use of budesonide in severe asthmatics aged 1-3 years.

Authors:  G J Connett; C Warde; E Wooler; W Lenney
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Short-term effect of albuterol, delivered via a new auxiliary device, in wheezy infants.

Authors:  R Kraemer; U Frey; C W Sommer; E Russi
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-08

7.  Bronchodilator effect of fenoterol and ipratropium bromide in infants with acute wheezing: use of MDI with a spacer device.

Authors:  J Mallol; L Barrueto; G Girardi; O Toro
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct

8.  A metal aerosol holding chamber devised for young children with asthma.

Authors:  H Bisgaard
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Reliable salbutamol administration in 6- to 36-month-old children by means of a metered dose inhaler and Aerochamber with mask.

Authors:  W T Conner; M B Dolovich; R A Frame; M T Newhouse
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1989

10.  Inhaled budesonide for treatment of recurrent wheezing in early childhood.

Authors:  H Bisgaard; S L Munck; J P Nielsen; W Petersen; S V Ohlsson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  Randomised controlled study of clinical efficacy of spacer therapy in asthma with regard to electrostatic charge.

Authors:  E Dompeling; A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H M Janssens; W Hop; J G Brinkman; R N Sukhai; J C de Jongste
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Reducing electrostatic charge on spacer devices and bronchodilator response.

Authors:  J H Wildhaber; G W Waterer; G L Hall; Q A Summers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Lung deposition of aerosol--a comparison of different spacers.

Authors:  H J Zar; E G Weinberg; H J Binns; F Gallie; M D Mann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Effect of plastic spacer handling on salbutamol lung deposition in asthmatic children.

Authors:  Brian J Lipworth; Daniel K C Lee; Jacob Anhøj; Hans Bisgaard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Inhalation devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Aerosol profile extracted from spacers as a determinant of actual dose.

Authors:  Sylvia Verbanck; Chris Vervaet; Daniël Schuermans; Walter Vincken
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Age dependent systemic exposure to inhaled salbutamol.

Authors:  Klaus Bønnelykke; Jakob Jessing Jespersen; Hans Bisgaard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Early bioavailability of inhaled salbutamol reflects lung dose in children.

Authors:  Klaus Bønnelykke; Jacob J Jespersen; Hans Bisgaard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  A path to successful patient outcomes through aerosol drug delivery to children: a narrative review.

Authors:  Arzu Ari
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

10.  Lung delivery of non-CFC salbutamol via small volume metal spacer and large volume plastic spacer devices compared with an open vent jet nebulizer.

Authors:  B J Lipworth; D J Clark
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.