Literature DB >> 10971314

Reducing electrostatic charge on spacer devices and bronchodilator response.

J H Wildhaber1, G W Waterer, G L Hall, Q A Summers.   

Abstract

AIMS: Plastic spacers are widely used with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI). Reducing electrostatic charge by washing spacers with detergent has been shown to greatly improve in vitro and in vivo drug delivery. We assessed whether this finding is associated with an improved bronchodilator response in adult asthmatics.
METHODS: Twenty subjects (age 18-65 years) with a known bronchodilator response inhaled in random order salbutamol from a pMDI (Ventolin) through an untreated new spacer (Volumatic) and through a detergent washed spacer. Patients received the following doses of salbutamol via pMDI at 20 min intervals: 100 microg, 100 microg, 200 microg, 400 microg, 800 microg. Spirometry, heart rate and blood pressure were checked prior to each dose and 20 min after the last dose.
RESULTS: There were no differences between baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) using either spacer (2.61+/-0.56 and 2.52+/-0.45 l, untreated and treated with detergent, respectively; mean +/- s.d.). The provocation dose required to cause a clinically significant improvement of 10% in FEV1 (PD10) was significantly lower when the detergent treated spacer was used (1505 +/-1335 and 430+/-732 microg, untreated and treated, respectively, P<0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated an improvement in bronchodilator response, in adult asthmatics, after reducing the electrostatic charge in a spacer device by washing it with ordinary household detergent. This finding stresses the importance of an optimal choice of delivery device for asthma medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10971314      PMCID: PMC2014986          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00251.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  9 in total

1.  Washing plastic spacers in household detergent reduces electrostatic charge and greatly improves delivery.

Authors:  F Piérart; J H Wildhaber; I Vrancken; S G Devadason; P N Le Souëf
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  In vitro performance of three combinations of spacers and pressurized metered dose inhalers for treatment in children.

Authors:  E Berg; J Madsen; H Bisgaard
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Electrostatic charge on a plastic spacer device influences the delivery of salbutamol.

Authors:  J H Wildhaber; S G Devadason; M J Hayden; R James; A P Dufty; R A Fox; Q A Summers; P N LeSouëf
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Effect of electrostatic charge, flow, delay and multiple actuations on the in vitro delivery of salbutamol from different small volume spacers for infants.

Authors:  J H Wildhaber; S G Devadason; E Eber; M J Hayden; M L Everard; Q A Summers; P N LeSouëf
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  The effects of static charge in spacer devices on glucocorticosteroid aerosol deposition in asthmatic patients.

Authors:  C J Kenyon; L Thorsson; L Borgström; S P Newman
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  A non-electrostatic spacer for aerosol delivery.

Authors:  H Bisgaard; J Anhøj; B Klug; E Berg
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Improvement in sodium cromoglycate delivery from a spacer device by use of an antistatic lining, immediate inhalation, and avoiding multiple actuations of drug.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; J Lynch; M Cant; C Robertson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  Spacer devices used with metered-dose inhalers. Breakthrough or gimmick?

Authors:  P König
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  A metal aerosol holding chamber devised for young children with asthma.

Authors:  H Bisgaard
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 16.671

  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  Bioavailability of inhaled fluticasone propionate via chambers/masks in young children.

Authors:  K Blake; R Mehta; T Spencer; R L Kunka; L Hendeles
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  Effect of oropharyngeal length in drug lung delivery via suspension pressurized metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  T Ehtezazi; D R Allanson; I D Jenkinson; C O'Callaghan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Drug delivery systems in children.

Authors:  Stephen Lowis
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Spacer devices for metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  Stephen P Newman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Inhalation drug delivery devices: technology update.

Authors:  Mariam Ibrahim; Rahul Verma; Lucila Garcia-Contreras
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-02-12

Review 6.  Spacer devices for inhaled therapy: why use them, and how?

Authors:  Walter Vincken; Mark L Levy; Jane Scullion; Omar S Usmani; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Chris J Corrigan
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2018-06-18

Review 7.  Inhaler technique: facts and fantasies. A view from the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team (ADMIT).

Authors:  Mark L Levy; P N R Dekhuijzen; P J Barnes; M Broeders; C J Corrigan; B L Chawes; L Corbetta; J C Dubus; Th Hausen; F Lavorini; N Roche; J Sanchis; Omar S Usmani; J Viejo; W Vincken; Th Voshaar; G K Crompton; Soren Pedersen
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.871

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.