Literature DB >> 7656962

A metal aerosol holding chamber devised for young children with asthma.

H Bisgaard1.   

Abstract

The low tidal volume and flow in preschool children may reduce the efficiency of aerosol delivery from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) through a traditional holding chamber. A prototype small-volume steel holding chamber with two one-way valves was devised to prolong aerosol availability in the chamber and to ensure unidirectional airflow. Dead space between the valves was minimized to less than 2 ml. The dose-delivery and rate of passive disappearance of a budesonide pMDI aerosol were compared between this prototype and the large-volume, single-valved plastic Nebuhaler, in 164 asthmatic children less than 8 yrs of age. In vitro, the half life of aerosol disappearance in the steel prototype and the plastic Nebuhaler was > 30 s and 9 s, respectively. In vivo, the prototype delivered an age-independent mean dose of 38% of the nominal dose, and the Nebuhaler delivered an age-dependent mean dose, ranging from 42% of the nominal dose in children > or = 4 yrs to 19% of the nominal dose in infants. We conclude that the use of plastic for holding chambers may influence dose-delivery, and single-valve control may cause age-dependent dose-delivery. Reproducible age-independent drug-delivery may be achieved by pMDI aerosol inhaled through a small-volume metal holding chamber with separate inlet and outlet valves and minimized dead space. This holding chamber would improve the possibilities of aerosol therapy for young children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7656962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  16 in total

1.  Randomised controlled study of clinical efficacy of spacer therapy in asthma with regard to electrostatic charge.

Authors:  E Dompeling; A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H M Janssens; W Hop; J G Brinkman; R N Sukhai; J C de Jongste
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Pectus excavatum: studiously ignored in the United Kingdom?

Authors:  R Wheeler; K Foote
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  How to choose delivery devices for asthma.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; P W Barry
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Reducing electrostatic charge on spacer devices and bronchodilator response.

Authors:  J H Wildhaber; G W Waterer; G L Hall; Q A Summers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Effect of plastic spacer handling on salbutamol lung deposition in asthmatic children.

Authors:  Brian J Lipworth; Daniel K C Lee; Jacob Anhøj; Hans Bisgaard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Asthma drug delivery devices for children.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; P W Barry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

7.  Inhalation devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Age dependent systemic exposure to inhaled salbutamol.

Authors:  Klaus Bønnelykke; Jakob Jessing Jespersen; Hans Bisgaard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Drug delivery from inhaler devices.

Authors:  H Bisgaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-12

10.  Effect of electrostatic charge, flow, delay and multiple actuations on the in vitro delivery of salbutamol from different small volume spacers for infants.

Authors:  J H Wildhaber; S G Devadason; E Eber; M J Hayden; M L Everard; Q A Summers; P N LeSouëf
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.