Literature DB >> 7474190

Incidence of prostate cancer diagnosis in the eras before and after serum prostate-specific antigen testing.

S J Jacobsen1, S K Katusic, E J Bergstralh, J E Oesterling, D Ohrt, G G Klee, C G Chute, M M Lieber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of prostate cancer in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1983 through 1992 to describe the secular changes that have occurred since the introduction of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to the community medical practice in 1987.
DESIGN: Population-based, descriptive epidemiological study with ecological and individual level comparisons over time. STUDY
SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota, where the Rochester Epidemiology Project provides passive surveillance of the population for health outcomes.
SUBJECTS: All 511 biopsy-proven incident cases of adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed from 1983 through 1992. The community inpatient and outpatient medical records of all incident cases were reviewed to evaluate the presenting characteristics of men at the time of diagnosis.
RESULTS: The age-adjusted incidence of biopsy-proven prostate cancer increased from 64 per 100,000 person-years in 1983 to 216 per 100,000 person-years in 1992. The increase occurred primarily between 1987 and 1988 and was predominately for organ-confined tumors. The age-specific incidence increased dramatically in this same period among men aged 50 years and older. Among men aged 70 years and older, however, prostate carcinoma incidence rates declined after 1990 following the initial increase. This decline among older men contrasted with community-based estimates of PSA utilization rates, which demonstrated consistent increases since 1987 to nearly 50% of the older population in 1992.
CONCLUSION: These results support the premise that the recent increase in prostate cancer is due in part to the increased utilization of serum PSA testing. Further, the increased incidence appears to be a transient phenomenon due to the depletion of previously undiagnosed cases from the previous pool. Finally, these data suggest that, in terms of stage at diagnosis, early detection efforts may be effective in identifying more early stage (smaller) cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7474190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  24 in total

1.  Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Miller; M A Diefenbach; L K Kruus; D Watkins-Bruner; G E Hanks; P F Engstrom
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  Knowledge, attitudes, and screening practices among older men regarding prostate cancer.

Authors:  C B Steele; D S Miller; C Maylahn; R J Uhler; C T Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Race/ethnicity and the receipt of watchful waiting for the initial management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Martin L Brown; Arnold L Potosky; Carrie N Klabunde; W W Davis; Judd W Moul; Angela Fahey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Interpreting results of prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  J B Meigs; M J Barry; J E Oesterling; S J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Evidence for autosomal dominant inheritance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  D J Schaid; S K McDonnell; M L Blute; S N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Molecular cytogenetic analysis of prostatic adenocarcinomas from screening studies : early cancers may contain aggressive genetic features.

Authors:  J C Alers; P J Krijtenburg; A N Vis; R F Hoedemaeker; M F Wildhagen; W C Hop; T T van Der Kwast; F H Schröder; H J Tanke; H van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Effects of chronic bacterial prostatitis on prostate specific antigen levels total and free in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohammed Nizar G Battikhi; Hussein Ismail; Qusey Battikhi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Quantitative proteomic profiling of prostate cancer reveals a role for miR-128 in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amjad P Khan; Laila M Poisson; Vadiraja B Bhat; Damian Fermin; Rong Zhao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; George Michailidis; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Gilbert S Omenn; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Arun Sreekumar
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Pathologic characteristics of cancers detected in The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: implications for prostate cancer detection and chemoprevention.

Authors:  M Scott Lucia; Amy K Darke; Phyllis J Goodman; Francisco G La Rosa; Howard L Parnes; Leslie G Ford; Charles A Coltman; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.