Literature DB >> 19138952

Pathologic characteristics of cancers detected in The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: implications for prostate cancer detection and chemoprevention.

M Scott Lucia1, Amy K Darke, Phyllis J Goodman, Francisco G La Rosa, Howard L Parnes, Leslie G Ford, Charles A Coltman, Ian M Thompson.   

Abstract

The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) showed a risk of prostate cancer at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <4.0 ng/mL and that prostate cancer risk is reduced by finasteride. A major concern about early detection by PSA and prevention by finasteride is that they may involve biologically inconsequential tumors. We reviewed the pathologic characteristics of prostate biopsies from men in the placebo and finasteride groups of the PCPT. We examined tumor pathology characteristics stratified by level of PSA for men in the placebo group who underwent radical prostatectomy. Seventy-five percent of all cancers and 62% of Gleason score <or=6 cancers in the PCPT met the biopsy criteria for clinically significant tumors. Surrogate measures for tumor volume (number of cores positive, percent cores positive, linear extent, and bilaterality) and risk of perineural invasion were lower in men who received finasteride. The PSA-associated risks of insignificant cancer were 51.7% (PSA, 0-1.0 ng/mL), 33.7% (1.1-2.5 ng/mL), 17.8% (2.6-4.0 ng/mL), and 11.7% (4.1-10 ng/mL). Conversely, the risks of high-grade (Gleason score >or=7) tumors for the same PSA strata were 15.6%, 37.9%, 49.1%, and 52.4%, respectively. These data highlight the dilemma of PSA when used for screening: Lower cutoff levels increase detection of insignificant disease, but cure is more likely, whereas higher cutoff levels make detection of significant cancer more likely, but cure is less likely. Therefore, the effectiveness of finasteride in preventing prostate cancer, including Gleason score <or=6 cancer, with meaningful rates of significant disease in the PCPT suggests that cutoff values for PSA screening should be individualized and that men undergoing screening should be informed of the opportunity to reduce their risk of disease with finasteride.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19138952      PMCID: PMC3985428          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  30 in total

1.  Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Chen Chi; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; Scott M Lippman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Finasteride improves the sensitivity of digital rectal examination for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Scott M Lippman; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Incidence of prostate cancer diagnosis in the eras before and after serum prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  S J Jacobsen; S K Katusic; E J Bergstralh; J E Oesterling; D Ohrt; G G Klee; C G Chute; M M Lieber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Aniko Szabo; Seth Falcon; Jake Wegelin; Dante DiTommaso; Kent Karnofski; Roman Gulati; David F Penson; Eric Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; M Carmichael; C B Brendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Leslie A Mangold; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A L Potosky; B A Miller; P C Albertsen; B S Kramer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer: likelihood, patterns of care, and outcomes.

Authors:  Piyush K Agarwal; Natalia Sadetsky; Badrinath R Konety; Martin I Resnick; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  28 in total

1.  Evolving role of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in chemoprevention.

Authors:  Wesley M White; Edward D Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Finasteride modifies the relation between serum C-peptide and prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser; Cathee Till; Alan Kristal; Phyllis Goodman; Ashraful Hoque; Elizabeth A Platz; Ann W Hsing; Demetrius Albanes; Howard L Parnes; Michael Pollak
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-02-23

Review 3.  Molecular targets for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  William N William; John V Heymach; Edward S Kim; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript stratifies prostate cancer risk in men with elevated serum PSA.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Sheila M J Aubin; Javed Siddiqui; Robert J Lonigro; Laurie Sefton-Miller; Siobhan Miick; Sarah Williamsen; Petrea Hodge; Jessica Meinke; Amy Blase; Yvonne Penabella; John R Day; Radhika Varambally; Bo Han; David Wood; Lei Wang; Martin G Sanda; Mark A Rubin; Daniel R Rhodes; Brent Hollenbeck; Kyoko Sakamoto; Jonathan L Silberstein; Yves Fradet; James B Amberson; Stephanie Meyers; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Harry Rittenhouse; John T Wei; Jack Groskopf; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Ongoing Use of Data and Specimens From National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Cancer Prevention Clinical Trials in the Community Clinical Oncology Program.

Authors:  Lori M Minasian; Catherine M Tangen; D Lawrence Wickerham
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer With 5α-Reductase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; Phyllis Goodman; Catherine Tangen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A seemingly most effective target for early detection and intervention of prostate tumor invasion.

Authors:  Yan-Gao Man
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Insulin-like growth factors and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins and prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial.

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser; Elizabeth A Platz; Cathee Till; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; Alan Kristal; Howard L Parnes; Yuzhen Tao; William D Figg; M Scott Lucia; Ashraful Hoque; Ann W Hsing; Ian M Thompson; Michael Pollak
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-01-11

9.  Characteristics of prostate cancers detected at prostate specific antigen levels less than 2.5 ng/ml.

Authors:  Joshua J Meeks; Stacy Loeb; Brian T Helfand; Donghui Kan; Norm D Smith; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Finasteride in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review.

Authors:  Angela B Smith; Culley C Carson
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.