Literature DB >> 11159178

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of prostatic adenocarcinomas from screening studies : early cancers may contain aggressive genetic features.

J C Alers1, P J Krijtenburg, A N Vis, R F Hoedemaeker, M F Wildhagen, W C Hop, T T van Der Kwast, F H Schröder, H J Tanke, H van Dekken.   

Abstract

No objective parameters have been found so far that can predict the biological behavior of early stages of prostatic cancer, which are encountered frequently nowadays due to surveillance and screening programs. We have applied comparative genomic hybridization to routinely processed, paraffin-embedded radical prostatectomy specimens derived from patients who participated in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. We defined a panel consisting of 36 early cancer specimens: 13 small (total tumor volume (Tv) < 0.5 ml) carcinomas and 23 intermediate (Tv between 0.5-1.0 ml) tumors. These samples were compared with a set of 16 locally advanced, large (Tv > 2.0 ml) tumor samples, not derived from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Chromosome arms that frequently (ie, > or = 15%) showed loss in the small tumors included 13q (31%), 6q (23%), and Y (15%), whereas frequent (ie, > or = 15%) gain was seen of 20q (15%). In the intermediate cancers, loss was detected of 8p (35%), 16q (30%), 5q (26%), Y (22%), 6q, and 18q (both 17%). No consistent gains were found in this group. In the large tumors, loss was seen of 13q (69%), 8p (50%), 5q, 6q (both 31%), and Y (15%). Gains were observed of 8q (37%), 3q (25%), 7p, 7q, 9q, and Xq (all 19%). Comparison of these early, localized tumors with large adenocarcinomas showed a significant increase in the number of aberrant chromosomes per case (Rs = 0.36, P = 0.009). The same was true for the number of lost or gained chromosomes per case (Rs = 0.27, P: = 0.05; Rs = 0.48, respectively; P < 0.001). Interestingly, chromosomal alterations that were found in previous studies to be potential biomarkers for tumor aggressiveness, ie, gain of 7pq and/or 8q, were already distinguished in the small and intermediate cancers. In conclusion, our data show that chromosomal losses, more specifically of 6q and 13q, are early events in prostatic tumorigenesis, whereas chromosomal gains, especially of 8q, appear to be late events in prostatic tumor development. Finally, early localized tumors, as detected by screening programs, harbor cancers with aggressive genetic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11159178      PMCID: PMC1850287          DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63983-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  48 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization evaluation of chromosome deletion patterns in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S F Huang; S Xiao; A A Renshaw; K R Loughlin; T J Hudson; J A Fletcher
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Prostate cancer diagnosis and management.

Authors:  M Frydenberg; P D Stricker; K W Kaye
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Interphase cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors by non-isotopic DNA in situ hybridization.

Authors:  J C Alers; H van Dekken
Journal:  Prog Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1996

4.  Analysis of 99 microdissected prostate carcinomas reveals a high frequency of allelic loss on chromosome 8p12-21.

Authors:  C D Vocke; R O Pozzatti; D G Bostwick; C D Florence; S B Jennings; S E Strup; P H Duray; L A Liotta; M R Emmert-Buck; W M Linehan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  W J Kirkels; J B Rietbergen
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1997

6.  Interphase cytogenetics of prostatic tumor progression: specific chromosomal abnormalities are involved in metastasis to the bone.

Authors:  J C Alers; P J Krijtenburg; C Rosenberg; W C Hop; A M Verkerk; F H Schröder; T H van der Kwast; F T Bosman; H van Dekken
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.662

7.  Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping.

Authors:  M L Cher; G S Bova; D H Moore; E J Small; P R Carroll; S S Pin; J I Epstein; W B Isaacs; R H Jensen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Chromosome 3p24-26 and 3p22-12 loss in human prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  R Dahiya; J McCarville; W Hu; C Lee; R M Chui; G Kaur; G Deng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1997-03-28       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Allelic losses on 18q21 are associated with progression and metastasis in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Ueda; A Komiya; M Emi; H Suzuki; T Shiraishi; R Yatani; M Masai; K Yasuda; H Ito
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Allelic imbalance and microsatellite instability in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J M Cunningham; A Shan; M J Wick; S K McDonnell; D J Schaid; D J Tester; J Qian; S Takahashi; R B Jenkins; D G Bostwick; S N Thibodeau
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  17 in total

1.  Expression of DDX27 contributes to colony-forming ability of gastric cancer cells and correlates with poor prognosis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Tsukamoto; Shoichi Fumoto; Tsuyoshi Noguchi; Kazuyoshi Yanagihara; Yuka Hirashita; Chisato Nakada; Naoki Hijiya; Tomohisa Uchida; Keiko Matsuura; Ryoji Hamanaka; Kazunari Murakami; Masao Seto; Masafumi Inomata; Masatsugu Moriyama
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Simultaneous tumour-like, atypical basal cell hyperplasia and acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a comparative morphological and genetic approach.

Authors:  A M Luebke; T Schlomm; B Gunawan; H Bonkhoff; L Füzesi; A Erbersdobler
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  High-resolution analysis of paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed prostate tumors using comparative genomic hybridization to genomic microarrays.

Authors:  Pamela L Paris; Donna G Albertson; Janneke C Alers; Armann Andaya; Peter Carroll; Jane Fridlyand; Ajay N Jain; Sherwin Kamkar; David Kowbel; Pieter-Jaap Krijtenburg; Daniel Pinkel; Fritz H Schröder; Kees J Vissers; Vivienne J E Watson; Mark F Wildhagen; Colin Collins; Herman Van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Regulation of SRC kinases by microRNA-3607 located in a frequently deleted locus in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini; Shahana Majid; Varahram Shahryari; Z Laura Tabatabai; Sumit Arora; Soichiro Yamamura; Yuichiro Tanaka; Rajvir Dahiya; Guoren Deng
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  ADRM1 gene amplification is a candidate driver for metastatic gastric cancers.

Authors:  Seok Hoon Jang; Jun Won Park; Hyo Rim Kim; Je Kyung Seong; Hark Kyun Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Genomic copy number analysis of a spectrum of blue nevi identifies recurrent aberrations of entire chromosomal arms in melanoma ex blue nevus.

Authors:  May P Chan; Aleodor A Andea; Paul W Harms; Alison B Durham; Rajiv M Patel; Min Wang; Patrick Robichaud; Gary J Fisher; Timothy M Johnson; Douglas R Fullen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Meta-analyses of methylation markers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Danjie Jiang; Yusheng Shen; Dongjun Dai; Yan Xu; Chunjing Xu; Huangkai Zhu; Tao Huang; Shiwei Duan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-23

Review 8.  DNA methylation changes in prostate cancer: current developments and future clinical implementation.

Authors:  Mohammad Obaidul Hoque
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.225

9.  Decrease and gain of gene expression are equally discriminatory markers for prostate carcinoma: a gene expression analysis on total and microdissected prostate tissue.

Authors:  Thomas Ernst; Manfred Hergenhahn; Marc Kenzelmann; Clemens D Cohen; Mahnaz Bonrouhi; Annette Weninger; Ralf Klären; Elisabeth F Gröne; Manfred Wiesel; Christof Güdemann; Jens Küster; Winfried Schott; Gerd Staehler; Matthias Kretzler; Monica Hollstein; Hermann-Josef Gröne
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Distinct genomic aberrations associated with ERG rearranged prostate cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Demichelis; Sunita R Setlur; Rameen Beroukhim; Sven Perner; Jan O Korbel; Christopher J Lafargue; Dorothee Pflueger; Cara Pina; Matthias D Hofer; Andrea Sboner; Maria A Svensson; David S Rickman; Alex Urban; Michael Snyder; Matthew Meyerson; Charles Lee; Mark B Gerstein; Rainer Kuefer; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.