Literature DB >> 745368

Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.

C Kamm, D D Dirks, M R Mickey.   

Abstract

A simple up-down adaptive procedure was used to estimate the 50% point on the psychometric function for loudness discomfort level (LDL) and the two functions describing the range of most comfortable loudness (MCL) for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. For pure tone and speech stimuli, median LDL and MCL levels were observed at relatively constant SPLs for subjects with hearing loss less than or equal to dB HL and at progressively higher SPLs with further increase in hearing loss. Correlation analysis verified a statistically significant relationship between LDL and magnitude of hearing loss. The nonlinear relationship between LDL and hearing loss together with the large intersubject variability in the data suggest that prediction of LDL from hearing threshold would often be highly inaccurate. These results also demonstrate that averaging LDL data across a group of subjects with a wide range of hearing loss may lead to inaccurate conclusions regarding the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on LDL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 745368     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2104.668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  11 in total

1.  Clinical Implications of Word Recognition Differences in Earphone and Aided Conditions.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William B Clinkscales; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) Protocol.

Authors:  M Valente; D Van Vliet
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-03

3.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

4.  Selecting and Pre-setting Amplification for Children: Where Do We Begin?

Authors:  D E Lewis
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

5.  Microcomputer applications for hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  R de Jonge
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1996-09

6.  Real-ear measurement of hearing threshold and loudness.

Authors:  L E Humes; C Pavlovic; V Bray; M Barr
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1996-12

Review 7.  Considerations in the Development of a Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument.

Authors:  LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 8.  Relations among Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Response Measures, Categorical Loudness Judgments, and Their Associated Physical Intensities.

Authors:  Peggy A Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 9.  Intra- and Intersubject Variability in Audiometric Measures and Loudness Judgments in Older Listeners with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

Review 10.  The DSL method for pediatric hearing instrument fitting: historical perspective and current issues.

Authors:  Richard Seewald; Sheila Moodie; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.